The characteristics of medical review are: ① comprehensiveness: the review should be "criss-crossed", with the development of a certain topic as the vertical line, reflecting the progress of the current topic; It is also necessary to make horizontal comparisons from units, provinces, the whole country and foreign countries. Only in this way, the article will occupy a large number of materials, and after comprehensive analysis, induction and sorting, digestion and identification, the materials will be more concise, clearer, more hierarchical and more logical, so as to grasp the development law and predict the development trend of this topic. (2) Comment: It refers to a more specialized, comprehensive, in-depth and systematic discussion of a certain issue, a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the summarized content, reflecting the author's views and opinions, and forming a whole with the summarized content. Generally speaking, the summary should have the author's point of view, otherwise it is not a summary, but a manual or lecture. ③ Advanced nature: Abstract is not about writing the history of subject development, but about collecting the latest information, obtaining the latest content and transmitting the latest medical information and scientific research trends to readers in time.
Summary should not be a list of materials, but a summary, comment and evaluation of materials read and collected in person. And draw important conclusions from the literature provided. A good summary should be a good article with both opinions and facts, bones and flesh. Because the review is a three-time document, unlike the original paper (one document), the cited materials can also include the author's own experimental results, unpublished or upcoming new achievements.
The contents and forms of the review are flexible and varied, and there are no strict regulations, and the length varies, from hundreds of thousands or even millions of words of monographs to hundreds or even thousands of references; As small as 1000 words, there are several references. Most published medical journals are 3,000-4,000 words, with15-20 citations, generally no more than 20 articles, and foreign language references should not be less than 1/3.
2, the content of the review requirements
If the topic is new, the topic of the review must be one that has not been published in this journal recently. If a review article is basically consistent with the published review article "Crash", that is, the title and content are basically the same, it is impossible to publish it in the same journal.
If you want to reason clearly, you must have sufficient information and be based on facts everywhere. Never make up data and diagnosis in a whimsical way, and write your own speculation into a conclusion.
The hierarchy is clear, and the author is required to have a clear thinking when writing, and have a unified thinking about what to write first, what to write later, to what extent, and how to deal with it before and after.
Language should be beautiful. Scientific articles take science as their life, but the language is meaningless and obscure, which will inevitably hinder the exchange of scientific and technological knowledge. Therefore, in actual writing, we should constantly strengthen the training of Chinese rhetoric and expression.
The literature should be new. Because most of the current reviews are "state reviews", 70% of the cited documents should be within 3 years. References are arranged at the end of the abstract in citation order, and the serial number is placed in the upper right corner of the argument (citation content). The cited documents must be accurate for readers' reference.
After the proofreading draft is written, it should be reviewed by relevant experts and further revised and improved from the professional and written aspects. This step is necessary because the author often pays attention to one side and ignores the other. Some conclusions are often absurd and cannot properly reflect the "true face" of a research topic. These problems can often be solved by proofreading.
On the one hand, this paper is research.