For more than ten years, I have published articles in foreign journals, reviewed manuscripts for some journals, and exchanged some views with my colleagues. Note that the following example is based on the hypothesis of this paper, and it has not been scientifically investigated, but it is just a brick to attract jade. Don't blindly adopt it.

It is difficult to publish articles abroad, and good journals are also difficult, but there are also some journals, especially those in Europe, which are not very demanding, but these journals are all SCI, and it is estimated that colleagues have the hope of success and promotion.

When doing projects and writing articles, we should pay attention to several problems:

1. Good choice. The topic should choose to solve a new problem and avoid the article "Me too", that is, others have done it and repeat it themselves. Most foreign editors

With the full-text index, there will be no new content in your article, and you will soon be on the board. Sometimes, the article "Me too" is obvious (simply repeating other people's articles), and sometimes it is not obvious. Such as organ blood in shock.

Change, even if no one does the same thing as you, these contents can be found in textbooks, and the results are predictable, but you can't pass "so what?" This question, Wen

Zhang is hard to accept. If the article "Comparison of Ischemic Degree of Different Types of Shock Organs" is renamed, although the results are purely descriptive and the mechanism is not discussed, ok.

Magazines will not be needed, but almost magazines will still be needed. If the article is changed to "Effects of Nitric Oxide Inhibitors on Cerebral Perfusion in Different Types of Shock", it is successful to add a component of mechanism discussion.

There's a good chance. If the article is changed to "Effects of Nitric Oxide Inhibitors on Cerebral Perfusion and Perceptual Function after Different Types of Shock Resuscitation", the result data will be increased.

That's better.

2. The experimental design should be reasonable. The most common mistake is to confuse Controlgroup with shamgroup. Simply put, control means that animals do not have any surgery, and

Fake means to have an operation, but remove the experimental factors that you are interested in. For example, hemorrhagic shock, sham means that all kinds of anesthesia, surgery and intubation are the same as those in the experimental group, but the blood loss is zero.

Shamgroup is much more important than controlgroup.

3。 In addition, a group of experiments can only have one variable, such as shock or no shock, and the way and degree of shock are the same among different groups (the same anesthesia level, the average artery reaches a certain level). Don't put the two variables of different degrees of shock and different types of shock together, or say that the degree of shock is different among different groups.

4. The data should be scientific. Many people compare the difficulty of a certain intubation technique, which is good. But the degree of difficulty is a subjective indicator. How to quantify it depends on your design. If the difficulty is simply divided,

There are three kinds of difficult/moderate/easy data, which are difficult to process and have low credibility. However, if the average successful intubation time of residents in the first three months is taken as an objective index, such data will be convincing for a long time. Compare two kinds

The effect of drugs should also have quantitative data (such as the time from pushing drugs to the disappearance of conjunctival reflex, the incidence of vomiting after LC, etc. ).

Don't be too eager to eat fat. You want to solve everything. An article can usually only answer one question.

6. The introduction is to explain why you did this experiment. Discuss your results, which are expected, which are unexpected, what are the new findings, and how to explain them. Don't confuse the two and infringe on each other.

For example, you want to analyze the tolerance of lying-in women and ordinary patients to hypotension after spinal anesthesia. You choose cerebral blood flow as the observation index. In the introduction, you can say that the treatment of hypoxemia is very important in maternal clinical operation.

Low tolerance to hypotension, manifested as mild hypotension can lead to nausea and vomiting. When there is a large amount of blood loss, the pituitary function is obviously damaged. So-and-so has studied that progesterone has xx effect on cerebral blood vessels (citation), so you designed this topic to

To explore the changes of cerebral blood flow in pregnant women with the same degree of hypotension during operation, and provide theoretical basis for safer operation in the future. The results showed that when blood pressure decreased by 20%, maternal cerebral blood flow decreased by 50%, while ordinary patients did not.

There is a significant reduction. Your discussion is that this article has confirmed your hypothesis, and the reason you think may be that normal people have good self-regulation function, but the self-regulation function of lying-in women is not good. The specific reason may be progesterone (cited)

Use), blood volume (citation), viscosity (citation) and other factors. From the results of this paper, it is suggested that maternal blood pressure should be maintained at a level higher than that of ordinary patients. The unsolved problem in this paper is that the oxygen consumption of pituitary and other brain tissues cannot be measured.

We don't know the relationship between blood supply and oxygen consumption. In the future, we should use other methods to measure blood flow in brain tissue more accurately and explore its mechanism better. it's over

7. When writing an article, you should first list a central idea, lay a good foundation, and then look for supporting and opposing your own literature. Sometimes after reading too many documents, I finally don't know where to go and who to trust, and then I find myself very confused.

8. Find a better foreign language first and do a good spell check. The grammar is so poor that people can't understand it. Nobody knows it's real gold. People who don't even bother to do spelling check will greatly reduce the quality of scientific research and have poor credibility.

9. Be familiar with foreign practices, such as animal protection and college approval.