1. confidentiality: In order to ensure the fairness and objectivity of the reviewers, the author information and company information of the paper should be hidden, and the reviewers can only see the contents of the paper.
2. Choose a suitable reviewer: the reviewer should be an expert in this field and have a deep understanding and research on the theme of the paper. At the same time, the reviewer should have no conflict of interest with the author.
3. Provide detailed review guidelines: Journals should provide detailed review guidelines for reviewers, including review standards and format requirements, so that reviewers can review effectively.
4. Ensure the independence of evaluation: Journals should ensure the independence of reviewers and avoid any factors that may affect the evaluation results.
5. Timely feedback: Journals should timely feedback the evaluation results to the authors, including evaluation opinions and evaluation scores.
6. Handling disputes over peer review: If there are disputes over peer review, journals should have clear handling mechanisms and procedures.
7. Protecting the rights and interests of reviewers: Journals should protect the rights and interests of reviewers and avoid any form of pressure or threat because of peer review.
8. Encourage public review: Journals can encourage public review, so that readers can also participate in the review process of papers.
9. Regular evaluation and improvement: Journals should regularly evaluate and improve the blind review process of papers to improve the efficiency and quality of peer review.
10. Abide by ethical norms: in blind evaluation of papers, journals should abide by relevant ethical norms, such as not revealing the identity of reviewers and not copying other people's research results.