Generally speaking, papers and experiments complement each other. As for the general papers published in China, it may not be necessary to have experiments, but it is very necessary for sci papers to have experiments. Sci paper itself is a highly theoretical article, and experiments have proved that it will make the views in the article more convincing and increase the readability of the article. However, the experiments of sci papers often make many authors have a headache, and sometimes they can't carry out the experiments due to reasons such as funds and time, and the writing of the experimental part also stumbles many authors, thus affecting the writing of sci papers.
1. The description of the experimental steps is incomplete. Many people think that beautiful results are the best in the process of writing a thesis. So they will ignore or pay little attention to the description of experimental research steps. When reviewers encounter such a manuscript, it is easy to give "the research results are very good, but because the experimental research steps are not clearly described, they feel unconvincing about their own results."
2. The analysis of the research results is not thorough. I often review some papers, and the research results are good, but in paper writing, it is like an experimental report, not a research paper. Because, the paper only describes their experimental findings, and does not prove that their findings are reliable, nor does it explain whether their findings are of great significance to this field. Obviously, such a paper can easily be considered as lacking in theoretical depth. Usually the discussion part of a good paper accounts for one-third of the paper.
3. The research conclusion is not valid. In general, the research conclusion should only say the research results and what happened in the discussion of the results. However, some authors cite many non-thesis research results in their conclusions, which makes people misunderstand. In addition, there is an important phenomenon that many people's research conclusions are repeated with the abstract of the paper. This kind of paper is unacceptable and should be taken seriously.
When publishing sci papers, you can also find professional institutions. Guangdong Wenhua has a professional research team, first-line peer review experts for training and consultation, and foreign native English editors for professional polishing.