Since "3 15" was exposed by CCTV on the same day, "Shuanghui Clenbuterol Incident" is still in progress. Although Shuanghui Group first apologized, then internal accountability; The government also quickly intervened, and some responsible persons have been initially dealt with ... but the reaction of public opinion still cannot be eliminated; Even the direction of many details is particularly worrying.

There are indications that following the Sanlu melamine incident, Shuanghui Clenbuterol incident is becoming a serious impact on the public.

Another landmark event of public confidence in food consumption. But the significance of having a specimen is one thing, and whether it can be "processed" into a sample that can be tested is another matter. If you can't draw inferences, scrape the bones and heal the wounds in the supervision system; If we just deal with it as it is, we can muddle through as usual. Then, we really can't see any more benefits than sprinkling a handful of salt on the already fragile wounds of the people.

We expect the clenbuterol incident to be a sample of a comprehensive introspection inspection system. Shuanghui claims to have an inspection procedure of 18, but the procedure of 18 and an independent supervision department can't even manage a pig. These daily loopholes, such as the weak implementation of the country's hard rules on inspection, should not be as deeply reflected as the "Sanlu warning inspection-free system" by replacing "general inspection" with "spot check"? Regrettably, CCTV reporters visited and found that "Clenbuterol" has been updated; Shuanghui itself also announced that it passed the test. The problem is that, according to the requirements, clenbuterol hydrochloride is the main routine test, taking into account the sampling of ractopamine and salbutamol, but the entrusted test results provided by Shuanghui are only for clenbuterol hydrochloride. In the face of such "evidence", how can we believe that Jiyuan Clenbuterol is only an "occasional special case" rather than "the universality of the industry"? How to tell whether it is "crisis public relations" or "sincere face"?

We had expected the accountability of this incident to be a sample for severely handling dereliction of duty of public officials. Now, 28 people have been dealt with. How to deal with it? 6 people were dismissed from public office, 9 people were dismissed, suspended 1 1 person, and 2 people were warned. Compared with the past, it is not easy to remove the shell, but compared with the prohibition of clenbuterol by the Ministry of Agriculture in 2002, compared with the exposure in 2006 but again today, compared with the harm suffered by consumers, will it be understood by the public as "serious treatment" to punish the staff of government functional departments for dereliction of duty without touching criminal responsibility?

We expect the accountability of this incident to be a sample of judicial rapid intervention in food safety incidents. Yesterday, some media called on the judiciary to intervene quickly. Calling for judicial intervention is actually an appeal to increase the illegal cost of the perpetrators, and it is the same understanding of the so-called "severe punishment and heavy law" to govern food safety. There are also many legal grounds to severely crack down on the production and sale of food that does not meet safety standards, resulting in serious consequences. As you can see, only agriculture, commerce, quality inspection and other departments are investigating now, and there is no precise blow of judicial intervention. The judicial intervention in the Sanlu incident was forced out a little bit. With this experience, Shuanghui should enjoy similar "treatment" as soon as possible.

We expect Shuanghui Clenbuterol incident to become a sample to warn the society after Sanlu. After Sanlu, the dairy industry has been improved, but Shuanghui in the meat industry has emerged. If the "freedom" that ignores the quality of production cannot be changed, and if safety cannot always be the "criterion" that determines the life and death of enterprises, there will be countless "pre-poisons". From this perspective, it is unreasonable for Shuanghui to pay a high price for its dishonest production and lax production.

The problem of food safety is destined to be an extremely difficult process from "chaos" to "great governance". But the more complicated the reality, the more it is necessary to show determination and attitude with concrete actions. I hope that after the Shuanghui incident subsides, people will no longer be left with the impression of "treating the headache and treating the foot pain"; It can be a sample for rectifying food safety problems, rather than a specimen of "making big things small and making small things small", which makes people feel embarrassed.