First, the standard of graduation thesis evaluation results
According to the relevant regulations, the grading results of graduation thesis can generally be divided into four grades: excellent, good, passing and failing. The specific standards of graduation thesis of Correspondence College of Central Party School are copied as follows for reference.
(1) Excellent
1. can correctly reflect the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, and can comprehensively apply the theories learned and the relevant knowledge of this major.
2. Be able to closely contact the actual work of this system, this department and this unit. The analysis of the problem is correct and comprehensive, with certain depth or originality, which has certain guiding significance for practical work.
3. The center is prominent, the arguments are sufficient, the structure is rigorous, the level is clear, and the expression ability is strong.
4. Rich materials and reliable data can be processed and sorted by scientific methods.
(2) Good
1. can correctly reflect the relevant policies of the party and the state, and can better use the knowledge related to this theory and specialty.
2. Being able to better connect with the actual work and correctly and comprehensively analyze the problems has certain reference function for guiding the actual work.
3. The center is clear, the arguments are sufficient, the levels are clear, the sentences are fluent, and the expression ability is good.
4. The materials are rich, the data are basically reliable, and it can be well processed and sorted.
(3) Pass the exam
1. Be able to correctly understand the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, have no principled mistakes in theory, and basically master and apply the relevant knowledge learned in this major.
2. I can also connect with practical work, basically express my views, and have certain ability to analyze and solve problems. However, the analysis of the problem is superficial, or it can only list the phenomena, and the center is not prominent enough.
3. There are certain arguments, the main data are basically reliable, and the sentences are fairly smooth.
4. There are certain original materials, which have been processed and sorted out.
(4) failure.
Any of the following circumstances shall be deemed as unqualified.
1. Violates the relevant guidelines and policies of the Party and the State, or makes mistakes in principle in theory, and has a poor grasp of relevant professional knowledge.
2. The article has no focus, unclear level and chaotic logic.
3. The material is messy or the main data is distorted, and the processing is poor.
4. The main content basically copied the achievements of others.
(5) Any paper that plagiarizes the achievements of others or is written by others, once found and verified, will be disqualified from evaluation and defense.
First, we must strictly grasp the above evaluation criteria, and must not lower the standards or raise the scores; Second, we should adjust measures to local conditions, but at the same time, we should "make a bowl of water even" for the same group of students, and we should not adopt different standards for different people.
Second, the writing of comments.
There are two opinions on graduation thesis: one is the opinion of the tutor, and the other is the opinion of the defense Committee.
(A) the guidance of the tutor's opinion writing
Instructor's opinion mainly evaluates the whole paper from the perspective of writing. The evaluation points are as follows:
1. Whether the viewpoint is correct and clear;
2. Whether the argument is sufficient;
3. Whether the analysis is comprehensive;
4. Whether the structure is reasonable;
5. Whether the statement is fluent;
6. Whether it has practical guiding significance.
The following is a comment on the article "Reflections on Stopping the Phenomenon of Arbitrary Charges in Primary and Secondary Schools":
This paper can integrate theory with practice, comprehensively analyze the current phenomenon of unreasonable charges in primary and secondary schools and its causes, and put forward measures to stop it, which has certain reference function for practical work. The article has reasonable structure, clear organization, sufficient arguments and fluent sentences.
(two) the writing of the opinions of the defense committee
1. What is the attitude of reply?
2. Whether the thinking is clear;
3. Whether the answer is accurate;
4. Whether the language is fluent;
5. Is there any remedy for the deficiency of the original text?
The following are the opinions of the defense Committee on the graduation thesis of the 86th students of the Correspondence College of the Central Party School, which not only objectively evaluated the defense situation, but also affirmed the topic selection and originality of the thesis. Make necessary supplements to the opinions of the instructor.
This topic is a sensitive issue in the current theoretical circle, and there are few systematic and complete research results. The author's topic is bold and his writing intention is clear.
In the process of defense, the thinking is clear and logical, and the discussion on some issues has deepened.
The writing of graduation thesis comments should be concise, the attitude should be objective, the evaluation should be appropriate, and the praise and criticism should be measured. It should be pointed out that some graduation thesis comments (especially the defense opinions) are too simple and hasty to be desirable.