Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Refuting the argument that money is happiness
Refuting the argument that money is happiness
Refutation is a common style of argumentative writing, which is especially valuable in criticizing and exposing some ugly social phenomena. But students often feel that they don't know where to refute and can't write. There is actually a train of thought in writing such articles, that is, 1, listing phenomena, 2, showing disadvantages, 3, exploring the root causes, and 4, pointing out the way out. This paper is suitable for high school texts. Taking Lu Xun's masterpiece "Takeism" as an example, this paper analyzes this characteristic of refuting papers.

Columnar phenomenon

List immoral phenomena in reality that hinder the healthy development of society. The typicality of case selection to alert people; The richness of the list, in order to arouse readers' * * *; The diversity of rhetoric can highlight literary talent and enhance momentum. Example:

I just studied art and recently sent a batch of antiques to Paris for exhibition. I don't know what will happen after that. There are also several "masters" holding several ancient paintings and new paintings and hanging them all the way in European countries, which is called "carrying forward the national light". I heard that Dr. Mei Lanfang will be sent to the Soviet Union to promote "symbolism" in the near future, and then he will go to Europe to preach.

Show shortcomings

Every ugly phenomenon will cause more or less social losses. Some losses are obvious, which makes people despise and spit on; But after a long time, there will be some losses, and many people can't see the harm of this imagination, so it is necessary to reveal it, which requires writers not only to have a profound vision, but also to have the ability to foresee through phenomena.

(this kind of blind delivery has caused the exhaustion of materials. Although some people say that digging underground coal is enough for the world to use for hundreds of years. But, hundreds of years later? Hundreds of years later, of course, we will become souls, or go to heaven or go to hell, but our children and grandchildren are still alive, so we should leave them some gifts. Otherwise, on the occasion of the festival ceremony, they get nothing, so they have to kowtow to each other and ask for some leftovers as a reward. This kind of reward should not be misunderstood as throwing things. It was thrown away. To put it mildly, it can be called "sending". I don't want to give examples here.

Explore the root cause

Looking at the problem from a philosophical perspective and a theoretical perspective shows the depth and breadth of thinking.

But we were frightened by what was delivered. First, British opium, abandoned guns in Germany, then French gunpowder, American movies, and various Japanese gadgets printed with "completely domestic products". Therefore, even sober young people are disgusted with foreign goods. In fact, this is precisely because it is "sending" rather than "bringing".