Excellent (90- 100)

(1) The thesis has good topic selection, rich content, comprehensive application of professional knowledge, correct point of view, incisive and thorough analysis, certain application value, unique insights and bright innovation;

(2) The materials are typical and true, with analysis;

(3) The structure of the paper is rigorous, the arts and sciences are fluent, the level is clear, the language is concise, the writing is fluent, the handwriting is neat, and the chart is correct, clear and standardized;

(4) Answering questions correctly, comprehensively and profoundly, giving full play, and speaking clearly and fluently.

2. Good (80-89 points)

(1) The thesis has a good topic, and can apply the professional theoretical knowledge learned to practice, and can raise and analyze problems. It is representative of the problems discussed, has certain personal opinions and practicability, and has certain theoretical depth;

(2) The materials are real and specific, and have strong representativeness. The material analysis is sufficient and convincing, but not thorough enough;

(3) The paper has a rigorous structure, clear levels, standardized writing, clear organization, fluent writing, neat handwriting, correct and clear charts and accurate figures;

(4) Answering questions in the defense is basically correct and to the point, and the spoken language is relatively clear.

3. Medium (70-79, out of 100)

(1) The thesis has good topic selection, substantial content and certain analytical ability;

(2) independently, the argument is correct, but the argument is not sufficient or the reasoning is not thorough, and the understanding of the essence of the problem is not deep enough;

(3) Specific materials, reasonable structure, clear hierarchy, strong logic, good expressive ability, basically correct charts and accurate operation;

(4) Answering questions in the defense is basically clear, and there are no mistakes in principle.

4. Qualified (60-69, full mark 100)

(1) The topic of the paper is general, and it is basically to analyze and solve problems with professional knowledge. The viewpoint is basically correct and basically completed independently, but the content is not substantial and the innovation is not enough;

(2) The materials are specific, and the methods of investigation and research have been preliminarily mastered, and the original materials can be preliminarily processed;

(3) The article is organized, but the structure is flawed; The argument can basically explain the problem and make a general analysis of the materials, but it is thin and lacks the depth of excavation of the materials, and the argument is not sufficient and comprehensive;

(4) The text expression is basically clear, the text is basically fluent, the chart is basically correct, and there is no major data error;

(5) Answering questions in the defense is still clear, and mistakes can be corrected after being prompted.

5. Unqualified (less than 60 points out of 100)

Any paper with one of the following problems will be considered unqualified:

(1) There are serious mistakes in the viewpoint of the article;

(2) There are arguments that ignore the evidence, or copy the ideas in textbooks and reference books mechanically and fail to digest and absorb them;

(3) Long-term digression or copying other people's articles, practicing fraud;

(4) Lack of actual survey data, empty content, confused logic, unclear expression and unreasonable sentences.

(5) there is a principled error in answering questions in the defense, which cannot be corrected in time after being prompted.