Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - Writing guidance for bachelor's degree thesis
Writing guidance for bachelor's degree thesis
Writing guidance for bachelor's degree thesis

Bachelor's degree thesis is an academic work specially designed for expert review and peer reference. It must be concise and focused, and don't describe common sense content that professionals are already familiar with. The following are the writing instructions for my bachelor's degree thesis. For more information, please pay attention to paper network graduation.

1. Writing of the Introduction to the Text

(1) The structure and main contents of the introduction

① Background and motivation of topic selection.

(2) Problems and statements.

③ The purpose and significance of the study.

④ Possible innovations and contributions

⑤ Research ideas and methods

⑥ The structure and content of the paper.

(2) the writing requirements of the introduction

Are you online? What is the background and motivation of the topic? In the part, we should pay attention to the correlation between background and motivation to a certain extent, and at the same time, there should be correlation. Write a thousand words, digression Wan Li? .

Are you online? A statement of the problem? Attention should be paid to pointing out the main problems to be raised. If there are several problems to be studied, they should be arranged in order of their importance and logical order, and strive to be clear. ? The purpose and significance of the research? With what? Possible innovations and contributions? These two parts should be based on theoretical contribution and practical value.

(3) Introduce common problems

① Incomplete constituent elements

② The background and motivation of topic selection are too broad.

③ Too much repetition with other contents behind the text.

④ The purpose and significance of the research are out of touch with the research questions.

⑤ Possible innovations and contributions are exaggerated.

⑥ The structure and content of the paper are too simple.

2. Writing methods of literature review

(1) The purpose and function of literature review

As a scientific research achievement, the dissertation is usually completed on the basis of previous research work or with the help and inspiration of others. Literature review is the abbreviation of comprehensive literature review, which refers to a systematic and comprehensive description and comment on the research achievements, existing problems and new development trends of the studied problems in a certain period of time through sorting, identification, analysis and induction on the basis of comprehensively collecting and reading a large number of relevant research documents.

(2) The main contents of literature review.

Literature review writing can be roughly divided into the following four steps:

(1) Summarize the existing research results or opinions according to the theme;

② Cite relevant documents;

③ Analyze, compare, criticize and summarize the existing research results;

(4) Find out the shortcomings and gaps of the existing research results, and put forward the problems that the author needs to study.

Literature review mainly has the following two writing methods:

Firstly, the content and details of the review are determined according to the contents of the read literature, and each detail is comprehensively analyzed and studied, and the manuscripts are written separately, and then summarized into a review article.

Secondly, according to the completeness, profundity and novelty of the literature, based on the most perfect, comprehensive, novel and scientific materials, the details of the literature review are written, and then the new contents of other literature materials are supplemented.

(3) Writing requirements of literature review.

① The content should be directly related to the problem studied.

② The content should reflect the main research results in recent years.

The content should be written according to the theme rather than historical clues.

④ Literature review should be critical.

⑤ Pay attention to the transition between topics (paragraphs).

⑥ Through literature review, the research blank and problems to be studied are drawn out.

(4) The main problems in literature review.

① Lack of some necessary literature review.

(2) Literature review has little relevance to the problems studied.

③ It is written in the same way as the textbook.

(4) The content is narrative and list.

⑤ The cited references are too few and outdated.

⑥ Many contents are not annotated and quoted.

⑦ Literature citation is not standardized.

3. Writing of research methods.

(1) The purpose and function of the research method

Research methods refer to the ideas, procedures, strategies and methods in the whole research process. Its purpose is to tell readers the specific research process and methods you have adopted. By understanding the research process and methods, readers can have a preliminary judgment on the reliability and quality of the research results. At the same time, some research results may be closely related to the research process and methods adopted, which laid the foundation for discussing the research results.

(2) The main content of the research method.

The definition of (1) problem and the corresponding assumptions.

② The reasons for adopting a certain research method and choosing a certain research object.

③ Introduction of research methods.

④ Description of the research object

⑤ Description of research tools

⑥ Specific consideration and practice of research methods to improve research quality.

⑦ Description of investigation and data collection process

⑧ Introduction of data analysis methods

(3) Writing requirements of research methods

(1) Seek truth from facts

② Specific and meticulous.

3 thinking carefully.

(4) The main problems in research methods.

(1) The content is simple and there are some omissions.

(2) improper use of methods, full of loopholes.

4. Writing methods of data analysis and result expression

(1) Purpose and function of data analysis and result display

Data analysis and result expression is to systematically analyze and process the collected data, and express the analysis results in accurate language to answer research questions and prove or overthrow the corresponding assumptions.

(2) The main contents of data analysis and results presentation.

① data collection, classification and screening

② Analyze and process the corresponding data and record the results.

③ Expression results.

④ test hypothesis

(3) Requirements for compiling data analysis and results presentation.

(1) Seek truth from facts

(2) prioritize

③ Standardized report

(4) The main problems in data analysis and result presentation.

① The data analysis method is too simple.

② The content of the result statement is partially missing.

(3) The content of the result statement is too complicated, regardless of primary and secondary.

④ Profit-seeking report

⑤ Tampering with data and results

5. Discussion and conclusion writing

(1) Purpose and function of discussion and conclusion

The discussion and conclusion part of the paper is the conclusion point of the whole paper, not the conclusion of a local problem or a branch problem, nor the simple repetition of the summary of each chapter of the text. It should reflect the author's broader and deeper understanding and thinking, and should start from all the materials and results of the whole paper and draw opinions through reasoning, judgment and conclusion.

(2) Main contents of discussion and conclusion

(1) state the main results

② Explain the relationship between the main results and the questions and assumptions.

③ State the main conclusions.

④ Explain the theoretical significance and practical value of the research results.

⑤ Point out the limitations of the research and the future research direction.

(3) writing requirements of discussion and conclusion

(1) The discussion should be prioritized.

(2) The discussion should have depth and breadth.

(3) The discussion should be carefully worded and logically rigorous.

④ The conclusion should be concise.

(4) Discussion and conclusion of major issues.

① Simply repeat the research results without discussing them at all.

(2) The discussion is general and lacks depth and breadth.

(3) Overexaggerating the contribution and value of research results.

④ Lack of understanding of the limitations of the research.

;