Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - High IQ is a vulnerable group! ! ! Thesis! ! !
High IQ is a vulnerable group! ! ! Thesis! ! !
College students, what makes you say that you are a vulnerable group?

I saw a news on Sina not long ago. At the beginning of the news titled "The widening social income gap leads to the strengthening of national vulnerability", the reporter randomly interviewed individual figures from several social strata in China. Results From migrant workers, college students, employees of state-owned enterprises, white-collar workers in private enterprises and gold collars in foreign enterprises, everyone thinks they are "vulnerable groups".

The middle class with a car, a house, a stable job and high income invariably call themselves "vulnerable groups". If we China people are not humorous, then this society is sick, and it is very sick! On the one hand, the media strongly advocate that China's economic aggregate will soon surpass Japanese to become the second in the world. On the other hand, China admitted that it was a "vulnerable group" and gradually spread to all classes. This strange situation was summarized by the media as "the widening income gap leads to an increase in the sense of national vulnerability". In short, it is caused by the widening income distribution gap in China.

What is a "vulnerable group"? According to the official definition, the specific composition of vulnerable groups generally includes children, the elderly, the disabled, homosexuals, mental patients, the unemployed, the poor, laid-off workers, help seekers in disasters, migrant workers, informal employees and people in a weak position in labor relations.

From this point of view, there are such a large group of people occupying the position of formal "vulnerable groups" in society, and why do those middle-class people who are working with high IQ and holding high salaries struggle to call themselves "vulnerable groups" with confidence? A little speculation about his psychology is nothing more than a desire to snatch his share from the limited resources of society, and then push himself to the top of the wealth pyramid, but Marek Hua Teng, who is worth tens of billions, still justifiably leads his share of housing subsidies. Anyway, don't ask for it for nothing, right This scene reminds me of the story in Titanic. When the tanker was about to sink for more than an hour, the responsible crew began to organize the elderly, women and children on board a limited lifeboat. At this time, Ross's mother casually asked if there were any lifeboats that were not too crowded. She wants to be "luxurious" and has a lot of space ... in "Do or die", she still appears as a rich man. As a wealthy class, she has more advantages to escape than other poor women and children in the lower class. She also hopes that the lifeboat will not be too crowded and can escape comfortably. At this point, one more person will survive in the lifeboat, but she actually wants as few people on board as possible for her own comfort ... Perhaps, according to the plot, we can say that Ross's mother didn't realize the seriousness of the problem. But back in our real life, we can understand that white-collar workers in foreign companies, employees of state-owned enterprises and car owners who call themselves "vulnerable groups" just don't realize the population crisis behind China's triumphant progress, and the limited social resources can't be reasonably distributed among the huge population in China, so they are lucky enough to give full play to their "weakness" to get some imperial grain supply. Competing with the real disadvantaged groups for those limited financial subsidies, in their eyes, as long as the annual salary is less than one million, as long as they can't afford manor houses and Mercedes-Benz LV Rolex, they are "disadvantaged groups" ...

Let's talk about the key points of this article again. Nowadays, college students generally think that they are "vulnerable groups", and I am extremely skeptical in contradiction and disgust.

Why are college students "vulnerable groups"? Because the export of college students in major universities has exceeded 6 million every year, because college students are facing structural unemployment, it is quite difficult to find a job ... In the final analysis, it means that it is more difficult for college students to find a good job after the expansion of enrollment, and even lower positions and wages are contested by thousands of people. Then a large number of people are unemployed at home, because they can't find a job, they jump off a building and rob a bank to commit suicide. Because the wages in big cities are as low as those of migrant workers, ants have formed ... In short, it has become a serious social problem for college students to find jobs, and the yellow diamond treatment for college students in the past 90 years has gone forever! Various media constantly reported the plight of college students looking for jobs, constantly amplifying the tragic situation of ten thousand people crossing the single-plank bridge, and then the jingle advocating the survival plight of college students on the Internet began to be worshipped and spread rapidly. Then the film and television industry quickly turned around and made various TV dramas reflecting the struggle, youth, helplessness and depression of college students, and the ratings exploded, so our teachers, our country, our media and our college students themselves.

College students are a "vulnerable group". Because of the great pressure to find a job, the initial salary is extremely low, and the employers try their best to exploit the labor force of the "high IQ" group, the whole group of college students are complaining about social injustice and their untimely birth, so the morbid psychology of "degenerate rationality" begins to breed, and they begin to place their hopes on the government in "resignation", so they begin to hate this society and learn to "see through the world of mortals"

Is this really the life state of our college students? University, as the power plant of social development and progress, is responsible for continuously transporting talents for the overall progress of a country in the most formal and top-level way, but you have cultivated these batches of reserve talents into "vulnerable groups"! However, our public opinion is obsessed with those statistics and is keen on conclusive reports. The analysis is only a superficial trend conclusion drawn from statistical data. Apart from blindly and automatically classifying ourselves as a "vulnerable group" brewed by these "official data" and "authoritative reports", we college students have not done in-depth thinking. Everyone takes it for granted that they are "vulnerable groups", subconsciously waiting for the so-called government assistance and preferential policies, but they don't know that the daydreams of this group will soon be tragically shattered when you fight alone in society in the future! As a college student, what exactly is your position for yourself? What kind of officially defined "vulnerable groups" did you meet? Children? Old man? Disabled people? Psychopaths? Migrant workers? ...... A young man in his early twenties, with hands and feet, has also experienced the baptism of four years of higher education and entered the social employment, thus becoming a "vulnerable group". Such an ironic phenomenon appeared. We can't blame all the responsibilities on one side. In the final analysis, who should bear the greatest responsibility, enterprises, governments, university education and college students themselves? Maybe I am not calm and tolerant enough. From the standpoint of college students, I always think that college students themselves have created their status as "vulnerable groups" ...

College students, why is it difficult for you to find a job?

College students, what makes you say that you are a "vulnerable group"

Some people say that it is caused by the expansion of enrollment. Excuses, all excuses! You can't change the environment, but you must adapt to it. This sentence has been sung in everyone's ears for many years. Recently, at least since Pangu's creation, human beings have begun to follow the principle of natural selection and survival of the fittest. Yes, in the 1980s and 1990s at the beginning of the reform and opening-up, college students in China could easily find a well-paid job, and really embarked on the road of changing their destiny with knowledge. No matter how bad they are in college, they can be assigned jobs and houses. Don't worry about Adventure Island at all. You can talk about life and philosophical poetry on campus. You can read Marxism-Leninism, Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping slowly. There will still be an iron rice bowl waiting for you after graduation. Unfortunately, such days are long gone. The same cake was divided among four or five people more than ten years ago, so the government will divide it among several college students harmoniously; Ten years later, thousands of people share the cake in the same area, and the government can't solve this math problem. Order college students to rob themselves, as much as you can. It is such a reality that the real society has completely entered a period with "competition" as its core value, and you must adapt to this situation. Why do you want to expand enrollment? Obviously, in order to improve the national quality, most young people who may become migrant workers and social gangsters should have the opportunity to receive higher education. Maybe that's it. After college, you still have some competitiveness. Without going to college, you may not even have the mentality of competition. What's worse, you don't even have the qualification to compete! My interpretation of enrollment expansion is that the overall competition level of most people has been improved, and this lifeless China, which was originally dominated by a few elites, was ruined in advance. In essence, the advantages outweigh the disadvantages! Therefore, there is no need for college students to use enrollment expansion as an excuse. Change is the only unchanging truth!

Some people say that the current enterprises are too harsh in recruiting people and try their best to exploit fresh graduates. Excuses, all excuses! As an employee employed by an enterprise and a wage earner, you are a commodity in the job market. The current talent market is a typical buyer's market. It is an eternal truth that supply exceeds demand and prices will be reduced. If you want to buy a good price, you have to please the target consumers and try your best to promote the market, just like ordinary goods. If there is really no technology, then we have to reduce the price and promote sales. As long as you can sell yourself and your inventory won't rot, it's good ... what do you want to do if you don't start from the basic work? Do you think you can become an engineer directly by learning some theoretical and technical knowledge from school books? After learning some management cases, do you go directly to the management? Every penny the enterprise gives you should correspond to your contribution to it. Now the market economy in China is becoming more and more active, and the competition in all walks of life has also entered a white-hot competition state. Enterprises that really live a good life are nothing more than those state-owned monopoly energy industries, while most of the remaining private enterprises and foreign enterprises have to be nervous all the time to meet the constant competition. Think about what you are in that position. Will corporate profits plummet without you? If you are dispensable and have no influence in the enterprise, how can you say that the enterprise will exploit you?

Some people say that the current enterprise recruitment requirements are very high, and they can speak and write fluently in Chinese and English, with good grades, experience as president of student union, proficient in computer operation, rich in professional knowledge and practical experience, hard-working, active and loyal. Such an omnipotent superman is undoubtedly making things difficult for college students. It is also an excuse! ! Although I am not a superman, these basic requirements that every line and every industry must have are not difficult for me at all. As a college student, you didn't even have these abilities for four years. You should scold yourself! Nowadays, college students have easy homework, rich campus activities, a computer and a mobile phone, a big library that opens books for free every day, and what laboratory campus media are there. Who really uses these resources?

When someone is reading English in the grass sun to prepare for CET-4 and CET-6, someone is chatting with her boyfriend. Some people study in class every class, and some people fight crazily in World of Warcraft CS. Some people read sages in the library and think about their ideals in life, while others watch porn in the dormitory and fantasize about Aoi sora. Some people are working part-time to earn money, while others are shopping in the mall with RMB given by their parents. When some people repeatedly struggle with an incomprehensible problem in the laboratory, some people repeatedly talk to themselves in depression about why he or she doesn't love me ... after graduation, they look for a job. Some people's universities are full of scholarships, party member, three excellent students, mathematical modeling awards, TOEFL IELTS Band 4 and Band 6, internships, XXX N and other awards, and they easily enter the top 500 in the world. Some people's universities are full of love, cohabitation and abortion.

Some people say that they are not famous students, and it doesn't matter if they have no background. They feel that their school is not good. Excuses, all excuses! I admit that relationships are just a shortcut to finding a job, but most positions in the market are prepared for most unrelated people through formal recruitment channels. Let's not talk about this relationship for a while. I also admit that students in famous universities generally have more advantages than students in our ordinary universities to find a good job, but when I think about it, the essence is that the overall quality of students in most famous universities is indeed higher than that of college students, and they are outstanding in foreign language ability, professional ability and thinking vision. But if you really make up your mind to build such a lofty dream, I'm sure it won't be too much loss to save the country for a few years after graduation.

I have heard many people complain to me about how bad their schools are and how "rubbish" their majors are ... and I always tell them again and again that there are good and bad majors, and the school is just a platform where gold can always shine, so the words of pediatrics sound so absent-minded, but if you really appreciate these words, which word is false? Regarding the professional hot and cold issues, Baidu's comments on any webpage are more scientific and reasonable than what I said, and I don't want to repeat them. Any university is just a platform for your growth. With this platform, it depends on how you use the resources on the platform. I believe that the core and common resources of every school are still universal, that is, every school has them. There is no essential difference between teaching building, library, multimedia classroom and gymnasium. Perhaps key colleges and universities have more high-quality lectures, more high-quality teachers, more books in libraries, and more enterprises recruited by schools. But now that the Internet and media are so developed, what information do you need to know? In the final analysis, the most important thing is whether your heart is strong and your confidence is sufficient. A university has so many useful resources, how much can you digest? No amount of lectures on resources and equipment is just a decoration.

Some people say that there are gender discrimination and appearance discrimination in enterprise recruitment. It is also an excuse! ! I admit that some jobs are really only suitable for men because of their special nature. If women do this, it will do harm to work and women themselves. However, under such circumstances, why not understand it earlier and consider changing careers and directions earlier? In the final analysis, you are not prepared enough, and you are bent on learning books and knowledge, which is out of touch with the job market. Speaking of appearance discrimination, I personally think that there is no strict appearance discrimination in positions that really need strength in the market, except for the recruitment of hostess in nightclubs. In the final analysis, many enterprises actually have "image discrimination" when recruiting people, and image is largely the external performance of internal quality. You said you were sloppy, listless, unkempt and wore some funny clothes and shoes to the interview. Can people not discriminate against you?

After writing here, I found that it was so long ... it's time to end. On the issue of college students calling themselves "vulnerable groups", I just felt a little sad by chance, and then expressed my humble opinion in simple and easy-to-understand sentences. Many college students have a weak fatalistic mentality. They can't grasp the fundamental contradiction that they should solve in college, but they are entangled in some small contradictions. For example, they always think that college should be romantic. Some people even care about their universities because they haven't been in love for four years. Some people are convinced of the marriage opportunism that "it is better to marry well than to do well" and are willing to be "married people" after graduation. Some people have been cynical until they graduate and enter the workplace, and then they begin to feel sorry for themselves. Some people are always suppressed by the "useless theory of universities", but they can't see where they are wrong. ...

These are some factors that cause the thought of "vulnerable groups" ...

College students, take off the hat of "vulnerable groups"!