1. Listen carefully to the judges' questions and make sure you fully understand their views. If necessary, you can ask the judges to further elaborate their own problems.
2. For the judges' questions, we should fully think and prepare. Before you reply, you should anticipate some questions you may encounter and prepare the corresponding answers in advance.
3. Give a reasonable explanation and evidence to the judge's query. If the judges think there is something wrong with your paper, you need to provide strong evidence to support your opinion. These evidences can come from literature, experimental data, case analysis and so on.
4. If the judge's query does point out the shortcomings of your paper, you should be brave enough to admit your mistakes and revise and improve your paper. This shows your rigorous attitude towards academic research and your sense of responsibility for your own achievements.
5. Communicate fully with the judges to show your in-depth understanding and research ability. When answering questions, pay attention to express clearly and clearly to avoid vague answers.
6. If the judges' questions are too subjective or irrelevant to the topic of the paper, they should learn to guide the topic in time and lead the discussion to the core content of the paper. At the same time, we should be polite and respectful to avoid conflicts with the judges.
In short, in the face of the doubts of the defense judges, we should maintain a calm, confident and professional attitude, and demonstrate our research ability and understanding of the thesis views through adequate preparation and communication.