Haibo Liu
Dr Feng Jun is the second postdoctoral fellow trained by the Law Institute of our college. His major is constitution, administrative law, media and information law. Now he is a researcher, professor and doctoral supervisor of the Law Institute. He has served as deputy director of the Constitutional Administrative Law Research Office of the Law Institute, scientific research director of the Law Institute, assistant to the director of the Law Institute and director of the Media and Information Law Research Office, deputy editor-in-chief of Legal Research, and executive director of the Cultural Law Research Center of the Law Institute. In addition, he is the vice president of china law society Administrative Law Research Association and a member of the third Youth Federation of the central state organs.
1In the summer of 993, Feng Jun graduated from the Law Department of Renmin University of China, majoring in constitutional administrative law, and became the first batch of doctor of laws majoring in constitutional administrative law trained in New China. Feng Jun had the desire to be a postdoctoral fellow in law school long before he graduated as a doctoral student. 1994 1 1 In June, he finally got his wish and entered the postdoctoral mobile station of the Law Institute to start his own postdoctoral research. Since then, he has forged an indissoluble bond with China Academy of Social Sciences and its Law Institute. No matter during the postdoctoral research or after leaving the station, Feng Jun can consciously adhere to the guiding position of Marxism and the correct direction of scientific research in his study and work, strive to practice the excellent style of study of integrating theory with practice, be rigorous and realistic, pay attention to self-discipline, and work diligently, and achieve good results. He has been rated as excellent in the Institute for many years in a row, and was named as the excellent party member of China Academy of Social Sciences on the occasion of the 80th anniversary of the establishment of the 200 1 China * * * Production Party.
Since 1994 engaged in postdoctoral research, Feng Jun has published more than ten personal monographs, co-authored and published dozens of papers and research reports, and made many achievements in the research fields of administrative law theory, research methodology of administrative law, administrative punishment, state compensation, civil service examination and selection system, administrative procedures, etc. Among them, the Research on National Civil Service Examination and Selection System was published in the Administrative Law Series (Volume II). Reflection on the Omission of the Theory of Balance (in cooperation with Professor Pi) has a great influence after the publication of China Law (No.2, 1997), and it is a representative work to comment on the Theory of Balance. After the publication of The Jurist (No.2, 1998), the article "On the reasons, development and prospect of the lagging administrative procedure system in China" was reprinted in Renmin University of China and the Abstracts of University Journals of Liberal Arts, and after strict screening, it was included in the Current Situation of Sino-German Administrative Law-Administrative Behavior, Administrative Supervision and Administrative Trial (Essays). His personal monograph "New Theory of Administrative Punishment Law" (published by China Procuratorate Press in 2002) is still at the forefront of similar research on the research, reflection and reform of China's administrative punishment system. For a long time, almost no one in China's administrative law circles thinks that there is anything wrong with the system of administrative organs monopolizing the power of administrative punishment. The only difference is whether the power of punishment should be relatively concentrated in some administrative organs and how. This is a relatively large directional error. Through research, the author found that the unitary administrative punishment system like China had been adopted by many civil law countries before World War II. After the war, this system led to the abuse of punishment power and the violation of human rights by the government. These countries have abolished the single administrative punishment system and adopted the dual judicial and administrative punishment system instead. More severe administrative penalties are directly controlled by the court, and administrative organs can only make decisions on some minor administrative penalties, such as small fines. As for the common law countries, the judicial punishment system is basically unitary. In this regard, China's administrative punishment system has fallen behind the times, and we should learn from the beneficial experience of western countries, actively and steadily change it according to China's specific national conditions, introduce judicial organs into the decision mechanism of administrative punishment, and take this as a breakthrough to push China's administrative legal system construction and administrative legal system construction to a new height.
In terms of topics, Feng Jun presided over and is presiding over a number of key topics, such as the orientation and division of administrative power in China under the conditions of market economy, the reform of WTO and China's administrative legal system, the reform and improvement of China's media legal system, the legal guarantee of China's cultural system reform, and the reform and improvement of China's copyright protection legal system. He has presided over or participated in many important academic activities, such as organizing and presiding over academic seminars at home and abroad for many times, participating in expert argumentation meetings or consultation meetings on important legislation such as the Administrative Procedure Law, the Administrative Licensing Law and the Administrative Punishment Law, being invited to participate in the seminar on administration according to law in the State Council, the seminar on Premier Wen's important speech on administration according to law organized by the Legislative Affairs Offices of Publicity Department of the Communist Party of China and the State Council, especially the seminar on China-EU human rights dialogue organized and coordinated by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs for many times, which has successfully completed the promotion of China's human rights policy, legal system of human rights protection and human rights.
Over the years, Feng Jun has actively participated in and earnestly completed relevant scientific research tasks. Including the influence of China's accession to the World Trade Organization on China's legal system construction, the research on the countermeasures of judicial system reform, the research on the basic law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, the research on information security legislation, and the investigation of media management practice in developed countries. In the work, it shows strong collective concept, organizational discipline and good team spirit.
In addition to academic work, Feng Jun also undertook some management work of the Institute, some of which required a lot of time and energy. For these tasks, Feng Jun can take them seriously, be conscientious and try to handle the relationship between scientific research and management. In the discipline construction of the laboratory, he led all the comrades in the laboratory to actively carry out research and academic exchanges and cooperation on media information law, organized many international and domestic academic seminars, and successfully declared the first and only discipline point of media and information law in China. Administratively, assist the leaders of the Academy to build the China Law Network, making it one of the main websites for legal academic research; To assist the leaders of the Institute to cooperate with Social Science Literature Publishing House, and organize the publication of China Forum on Rule of Law and Teaching Materials for Master of Laws. These two sets of publications have had a good influence in academia and society after their publication. In addition, he also undertook and participated in many other management work of the Institute, and his work attitude and achievements were affirmed and recognized by leaders and comrades.