1. Students' ideas about the composition are not accurate enough. For example, in this composition, all three of his materials appeared on the Internet, but in the end they were all proved to be false and untrue.
The key words that need to be grasped are online speech and hot rumors.
In other words, the object we want to discuss should be online speech and people's attitude towards online speech, that is, rumors.
In view of this phenomenon, your thinking should focus on online speech and spreading rumors. In other words, the focus of your thinking is why people spread unconfirmed online comments and why this phenomenon occurs.
3. But many students basically put forward the conclusion that people believe in online speech directly, and then say what we should do. There are few reasons to really explore the phenomenon of people spreading online speech. The teacher thinks this is the key point to understand this material accurately and deeply.
4. Most students have this logic, that is, why does someone spread it? Be rational because you are credulous. There is nothing wrong with this, but it is too simple and casual, not deep enough, not touching the essence, and not being deep enough can not convince readers. Can you further think about the deep-seated reasons, such as people's thinking inertia, because it is easier to simply believe than to think carefully, and people always like to choose a good path, which is human nature and lazy nature. For another example, the Internet era is a fragmented era. People all accept fragmented information in the time of fragmentation. This is an era of quick browsing, and people don't leave themselves time for meditation. For example, the information on the network is overwhelming and complicated. Faced with this information, when people do not have the ability to distinguish and think independently, they will naturally be taken away by online speech. Students think, is my analysis more profound and convincing than your direct conclusion that people are too credulous, irrational and emotional?
Students, it is because of simple logic that you are easy to go astray. If you don't know what the point of your composition is, you may not know where to start. You come to the conclusion that people believe in rumors, but you don't explore why you believe in rumors, because you haven't thought about rumors, or you can't think about rumors, so you naturally come to the statement of how important it is to refuse rumors and how serious it is to spread rumors. Everything you said is right, but your article is not targeted and can't impress me. Because you are still wandering on the surface, not deep inside. What I mainly want you to say is why, but what you said is what harm it is. I don't mean that these things can't be written, but that these things are not important content and should be supplementary content. Your opinion is why people believe in online speech. Then naturally talk about how to solve it.
Please read your article again according to the teacher's brief comments and see where your problem lies. Do you have such a problem? To sum up, so far, it should be said that only a few students can accurately grasp the key points and consciously embark on the road of in-depth analysis, while most students basically stay in simple and rude logical thinking and stay on the surface. I emphasize to you again that the purpose of argumentative writing is to exercise your logical thinking and cultivate your ability to analyze problems comprehensively and thoroughly. Give you a composition. The purpose of this article is to present your opinion and let me see if your analysis is reasonable and fair. Whether you can convince the readers can be used as the correct criterion for your own evaluation of the article.
Socrates, the great philosopher, also emphasized that we should pay attention to the logic behind the conclusion, not the conclusion. Along this line of thought, I hope that students will think about their argumentative writing and will certainly gain something.
Come on, class!