First of all, I agree that teachers and students, and people should respect each other. I agree with "respecting education". Our society needs to respect people too much. And learn to respect people, we must start from an early age. But you can't say clearly what respect is and how to do it. We need to think more, study more and discuss more.

An article in Beijing Youth Daily (165438+126 October) about "respecting education" with the title "Students don't have to shout to report when they are late" is regarded as respect for students. However, is it disrespectful to ask students to be late?

Many schools have such a rule: if students are late, they should call to report and get the teacher's permission before entering the classroom. Students used to shout "report", but now they say "I'm sorry" and "I'm sorry" (maybe influenced by English textbooks? The textbook is a standard dialogue: excuse me. Sorry, I'm late. may I come in? Please come in. The dialogue between teachers and students is natural, polite, polite and human. What's wrong and disrespectful? I think this rule is reasonable. As we all know, being late (whether for class, meeting, appointment, etc. ) It is impolite or disrespectful to others. Can't students apologize for being late for class, which affects their study, teachers' lectures and other students' lectures? Teachers respect students and try not to affect your class. Students should also respect teachers and other students and apologize for the inconvenience caused. Don't we advocate saying "please, hello, thank you, sorry"? Saying "I'm sorry" is the most suitable practical occasion, so why not make full use of it? When we contact some foreign teachers, we always feel that they use polite expressions (thank you, I'm sorry, etc. ) much more than us, and they are not man-made. This is a habit of long-term cultivation and practice. In the words of Bai Yang, a famous writer, it is formed when mothers wipe their children's bottoms.

Maybe the experimenter overcompensated for some disrespectful practices? But isn't this going from one extreme to the other? Suhomlinski believes that the more we respect a person and a student, the higher our requirements are. While respecting the student, don't forget to teach him to respect others. Lack of this requirement is a kind of disrespect. At present, the phenomenon of being late is quite common, and quite a few students still don't respect teachers' work, other students' learning rights and themselves. I think it is necessary to adhere to the rules and regulations of late reporting in most schools, which is an important part of "respect education" in itself. Except in rare cases, it is not advisable not to shout a report. Please report being late and apologize is not disrespectful, but a courtesy. In modern society, if you don't apologize, people will think you are impolite, uneducated, rude and sometimes despise you. Around us, we often hear people criticize each other for being impolite: "You don't even say sorry?" If you don't require strict training in this field from an early age, it will be a hundred times more difficult to correct it later. Respect education and don't give people the impression that students can only coax and hold. You know, "bludgeoning" and "killing" can also destroy a person. In today's urgent need to strengthen school management, advocating or popularizing "not reporting late" will only lead to confusion and ridiculous situation. It's more like a show when the inspection team comes.

We tend to pay too much attention to superficial forms. More attention should be paid to the essence. A while ago, "quality education" was also a form called "showing off" by many ordinary people, but it didn't pay enough attention to really improving people's quality and learning to be a modern civilized person, including the essence of self-esteem and respect for others. Many reasons in the above article are very good. We really hope that the theory of quality education (including respect education) can be truly implemented. There must be other good experiences in the practice of a certain district in Beijing, which I hope to see (I don't know why I singled out "being late for reporting" as a representative). It is understandable that individual practices may have deviations or different opinions or be improved through discussion.

Another article in the same report also quoted "no need to stand up in class" to show respect for the equality of students and teachers and students, which is also debatable. It is also a rule in most of our schools that students stand up in class. It is a tribute to the teacher (and a reminder to start class now), not inequality. When you associate with friends, does it mean that you are unfair to stand up? Is it unfair for students to sit at the teacher's desk in class? Obviously, I can't understand this. What matters is not these forms, but genuine respect from the heart. Individual teachers have other ways, and some countries and regions have different ways such as bowing and greeting. As long as it is suitable, there is no equality and inequality. Equality between teachers and students should be reflected in mutual respect in the process of education. The most important thing now is that the higher education director should not force teachers to oppress students with exam-oriented education, and should not force students to study, but should be persuasive and stimulate students' interest in learning.