2. Analyze with the method of "one divides into two" to prevent such a problem: self-contradiction. In an instant, opening the book is beneficial, and in an instant, opening the book is harmful and confusing. In order to avoid this phenomenon, it is necessary to point out the connection between the two in the article in order to truly explain the truth.
3. From the argument method, if the book you read is not good, it may not be good to open it. Here, we can take examples, supplemented by citations and metaphors, take the flood of pornographic books in society in previous years as factual arguments and famous sayings as theoretical arguments to fully demonstrate the harm of pornographic books and the benefits of reading good books. On this basis, the two are unified in the right way. It shows that we middle school students should not only read more books, but also choose carefully and read good books. In this way, from both positive and negative arguments, the problem will be more comprehensive and profound, and the article will have irrefutable logical power.
Introduction: This is a composition of materials. Although this topic stipulates the composition topic, it still leaves a lot of room for students to think. From the stylistic point of view, writing an argumentative essay is the best choice. Students can talk about their views from the aspects of right and wrong, attitude towards life, and spirit of scholarship, and elaborate their views and opinions. To write a good argumentative essay, we must do the following three things:
1, confirm the argument. According to the materials provided by the proposer, many viewpoints can be extracted from different angles, but a 600-word essay cannot cover everything. So we must choose an argument and fully demonstrate it.
2. Choose a good argument. Argument can fully prove the argument, and the choice of argument should follow two principles: ① it is true and conclusive, and there can be no false elements; (2) It is typical and persuasive, and can play a great role.
3. Organizational argumentation structure. The most commonly used structure is generally "asking questions (introduction)-analyzing questions (papers)-solving problems (conclusions)".