Scoring rules for scoring items and scores

1. The comprehensive quality of the applicant. Including the applicant's professional foundation, academic performance, scientific research interest, experience and ability, comprehensive performance, international communication ability (including foreign language level), development potential, etc.

Weight: 20% 8- 10 score ① Excellent academic performance and solid professional foundation.

(2) Have a strong interest in scientific research and rich experience in scientific research, and have participated in major international scientific research cooperation projects, major national projects, major key research projects (special projects), state key laboratories, key laboratories of the Ministry of Education, key research bases of humanities and social sciences of the Ministry of Education, and national engineering (technology) research centers.

(3) Strong research ability, innovative patent registration, or published high-level academic papers/monographs in related fields in core journals, participated in important international academic conferences and read papers, etc.

④ Outstanding performance in all aspects, high comprehensive quality and great development potential.

⑤ Excellent foreign language proficiency; Have foreign exchange experience.

5-7 points ① Good grades and good professional foundation;

(2) Have certain interest in scientific research, have certain scientific research experience, and have participated in international scientific research cooperation projects or general scientific research projects in this field.

(3) Have certain research ability and participated in international academic conferences.

④ High comprehensive quality, with certain development potential.

⑤ Good foreign language skills; Have certain international communication skills.

1-4 points ① The academic performance is average and the professional foundation is not very solid.

② No scientific research experience and weak research ability.

③ The comprehensive quality is average, and the development potential is not great.

(4) Poor international communication skills and poor foreign language proficiency.

2. The research level of the countries and institutions of study abroad in the selected disciplines and professional fields.

Weight: 20% 8- 10 score ① The research level of the destination country is in the leading position in the world, and the study unit is a world-class university or authoritative institution, or the research level in the professional field to be studied abroad is very high.

② Good scientific research conditions.

5-7 points ① The research level is different from that in China, and the research level of overseas study units is relatively advanced in China.

② Good scientific research conditions.

1-4 score ① The research level is close to or not as good as that in China.

② Limited scientific research conditions.

③ Universities with bad records abroad.

3. The situation of foreign tutors

Weight: 20% 8- 10. ① Foreign cooperative scholars or tutors are world-renowned professors or authorities in this field and have strong academic influence.

(2) Have rich experience in scientific research/teaching, be active in the frontier field of this discipline all the year round, have strong scientific research strength, and have published high-level articles or produced scientific research results in recent years (determined by the professional field).

(3) Close contact with the applicant's domestic tutors and units, the same research topics, and cooperative research projects.

④ The major of foreign tutors is closely related to that of domestic applicants.

5-7 points ① The level of foreign cooperative scholars or tutors is good.

(2) Have a certain scientific research/teaching ability, actively engage in scientific research in this discipline, and have high-level articles and achievements in recent years (determined by professional fields).

(3) Have certain contact with the applicant's domestic tutors and units, and have no experience in cooperative research projects or topics.

④ The major of foreign tutors is closely related to that of domestic applicants.

1-4 score ① There is no difference between foreign tutors and domestic tutors, or they are not as good as domestic tutors.

② General teaching/research experience, no articles or achievements in recent years (determined according to the professional field).

③ The research direction of foreign tutors is not related to the applicant's major (research direction) in China.

There is not enough time and energy to guide students, such as being too old or enrolling too many students that year.

4. Professional situation of studying abroad

Weight: 15% 8- 10 Score ① It belongs to major national projects, major projects, interdisciplinary/blank disciplines urgently needed by the country or key technologies and key frontier disciplines of national development.

② China has not yet developed or just started, and there is a big gap between the development level and the international level.

③ The major of studying abroad (research direction) is closely connected with the major studied in China.

5-7 points ① belong to provincial projects and topics; There is an urgent need for cross/blank disciplines and cutting-edge disciplines at the provincial, ministerial or school level.

② There is a big gap between the domestic development level and the international level.

③ There is a certain convergence between the major of studying abroad and the major of studying abroad in China.

1-4 points ① general disciplines and majors

(2) There is no need to study abroad because the domestic development level is not much different or higher than that of the world; The applicant has no relevant professional background.

5. The necessity of studying abroad and the feasibility of studying abroad plan

Weight: 15% 8- 10 Score ① The applicant's major and current research direction have a strong correlation with the major (research direction) of studying abroad, and the goal of studying abroad is very clear.

② The applicant or the unit/tutor to which the applicant belongs is very familiar with the countries, institutions and partners to be visited, and has established a long-term or substantial cooperative relationship.

③ The training plan jointly formulated by domestic and foreign tutors is concrete and feasible.

5-7 points ① The applicant's major and current work are closely related to the major (research direction) of studying abroad.

② The applicant has a good understanding of the countries, institutions and partners he intends to go to, but has not yet had a cooperative relationship.

③ The goal of studying abroad is clear and the plan is basically feasible.

1-4 score ① The applicant's major and current work are quite different from those of studying abroad (research direction).

(2) The applicant is unfamiliar with the countries, institutions and partners to be visited.

(3) the goal of studying abroad is unclear, and the plan is difficult to complete.

6. The recommendation attitude of the applicant's unit and the evaluation of the applicant by the selection unit at the school evaluation stage.

Weight: 10% 8- 10 score ① The overall evaluation of the applicant by school experts is high.

(2) The selection unit has an excellent comprehensive evaluation of the applicant's ideology and morality, study and scientific research, and actively recommends it.

5-7 points ① The overall evaluation of the applicant by the school experts is good.

(2) generally recommended by the selection unit, which basically conforms to other inspection standards of the selection unit for the applicant.

1-4 points ① The overall evaluation of the applicant by school experts is average.

② The recommendation attitude of the selection unit is not positive or not recommended, which fails to meet the inspection standards of the selection unit for applicants.