The concrete manifestations of academic nature in theoretical papers include research topics, academic discourses and theoretical (paradigm) perspectives. To judge the academic theory of a paper, we should first look at the nature of the research topic it chooses, the academic degree of the words it uses, and whether it has a clear theoretical perspective.

Specifically, the academic performances in theoretical papers are:

-The argument is correct. The correct argument is the vitality of the paper and must stand the test of practice. Therefore, the author is required to demonstrate objectively without personal prejudice.

-The truth of the argument. The materials and data cited in the paper must conform to the objective reality. The author of the paper must make full use of the materials through experiments, observation and investigation, and the facts should be sufficient and convincing.

-Good argument. The discussion process of the paper conforms to the law of human reasoning, with distinct levels, coherent beginning and end and rigorous structure. Argumentative writing is to prove an argument with arguments, and its purpose is to reveal the inevitable logical relationship between arguments.