According to the requirements for the evaluation and submission of thesis titles in 20 17, the applicant's age, teaching experience, working years and education (degree) are all closed at 20 15 12 3 1.
2. The publication time, award-winning time, evaluation time, commendation award and teaching and scientific research achievements of the applicant's thesis (treatise) are all up to 20 15 12 3 1.
3. Papers submitted for review (including teaching cases and educational narrative research) must be independently written by myself in combination with the teaching practice of this discipline, with no less than 1500 words.
4. No less than 2 papers submitted by normal applicants (one province and one city) and no more than 4 papers; Without exception, those who apply for the professional and technical qualifications of senior middle school teachers must refer to the fourth paragraph of Article 2 of General Education Title [2015] No.8? Exception review conditions? The provisions of relevant award-winning certificates and papers (treatises) with corresponding grades and quantities that meet the conditions of exceptional evaluation can be recognized.
5. When submitting a paper for review, submit an electronic manuscript that is consistent with the original (inconsistent will not be reviewed). Please sign the author, publication (award-winning) time and publication name (award-winning unit) at the end of each paper.
6. Time for submission of papers in our school: March 29th? March 3 1
Place of delivery: Party and government offices in two campuses
Key points of submission: the application form is printed on A4 paper on both sides, in duplicate, and the signature column of the applicant is signed with black ink pen; ? What is the declaration type? Fill in the general declaration form.
Papers published in the original magazine, award-winning papers and papers.
According to the "Jiangsu Province primary and secondary school teachers' professional and technical qualifications (Trial)" (Su Title [2009]14) and relevant policies of Xuzhou City? Appraising or defending the educational and teaching papers of those who declare the qualifications of middle school teachers for senior and intermediate positions. Papers can only be declared after they have been appraised and passed the teaching ability test? On April 8th, jiawang district started the evaluation of thesis titles in Cai Ying Middle School, and the evaluation has been successfully completed.
According to statistics, there are 228 applicants in this district this year, and 6 17 papers need to be marked. After review by the members of the thesis review committee, 8 papers were suspected of plagiarism or certificates need to be further implemented. On the morning of April 9, the thesis review committee defended or confirmed the papers or certificates of these eight people, and finally confirmed that two people had the behavior of practicing fraud and plagiarizing other people's articles. In the afternoon, the violator was punished, and two teachers were disqualified from participating in the evaluation of intermediate titles of primary and secondary school teachers in Xuzhou within four years.
First, the identification of thesis titles is a policy and academic work. Relevant personnel involved in the evaluation of thesis titles must take this work seriously and give scientific and fair evaluation to the papers submitted for review.
Second, the thesis appraisal is divided into four grades: excellent, good, average and unqualified. The specific assessment criteria are as follows:
1, the theoretical point of view is correct, which conforms to the requirements of principles and policies, scientific principles, modern educational concepts, social and historical changes and student development, and meets the requirements of basic education curriculum reform outline and curriculum standards.
Excellent: correct views, unique insights in exploring the laws of education and teaching;
Good: correct point of view, able to analyze or summarize some educational and teaching phenomena;
General: the viewpoint is basically correct, and I can talk about my own education and teaching experience;
Unqualified: scattered opinions, bias and even scientific mistakes, talking in general terms.
2. Practice theory is closely integrated with practice, guided by scientific theory, and practical experience is rationally sublimated.
Excellent: the material comes from education and teaching practice, and through the elaboration and analysis of work practice, the law of education and teaching is revealed;
Good: the materials are authentic and can reflect the laws and present situation of education and teaching;
General: enumerate some examples in education and teaching, reflecting the general laws of education and teaching;
Unqualified: little contact with reality, empty, false or improper examples.
3. It is enlightening and original, and has guiding significance for education and teaching practice.
Excellent: it can guide the reform of education and teaching, and has achieved remarkable results in improving the quality of education and teaching and improving the efficiency of running schools;
Good: it has certain guiding significance to education and teaching, and proves that its views and practices have a positive effect on education and teaching reform;
General: you can learn from it;
Unqualified: the guiding function is general, or even no guiding function.
4. The language expression is rigorous, fluent and standardized.
Excellent: rigorous argumentation, strong logic, incisive language and a certain literary talent;
Good: clear analysis and fluent language;
General: the language is basically fluent, and I can basically express my views;
Unqualified: the logic is chaotic, the structure is loose, or there are many language diseases, and the words are not satisfactory.
According to the above appraisal standards, the papers are comprehensively considered and graded accordingly.
Three, one of the following circumstances, the paper is also classified as unqualified:
1, plagiarism or plagiarism;
I didn't write the article myself, but asked someone else to write it.
Four, in order to ensure the fairness and scientificity of paper appraisal, each paper submitted for review is reviewed by two people respectively, and then the comprehensive evaluation grade is written. If the appraisal opinions of the papers cannot be unified, they shall be reviewed by the review leading group.
Five, the bureau title evaluation leading group will be fully responsible for the evaluation of the title of the paper, and deal with related matters in the evaluation of the paper.
Six, the paper reviewer, if there is any violation of discipline, once verified, will be dealt with seriously.
First, the identification of thesis titles is a policy and academic work. Relevant personnel involved in the evaluation of thesis titles must take this work seriously and give scientific and fair evaluation to the papers submitted for review.
Second, the thesis appraisal is divided into four grades: excellent, good, average and unqualified. The specific assessment criteria are as follows:
1, the theoretical point of view is correct, which conforms to the requirements of principles and policies, scientific principles, modern educational concepts, social and historical changes and student development, and meets the requirements of basic education curriculum reform outline and curriculum standards.
Excellent: correct views, unique insights in exploring the laws of education and teaching;
Good: correct point of view, able to analyze or summarize some educational and teaching phenomena;
General: the viewpoint is basically correct, and I can talk about my own education and teaching experience;
Unqualified: scattered opinions, bias and even scientific mistakes, talking in general terms.
2. Practice theory is closely integrated with practice, guided by scientific theory, and practical experience is rationally sublimated.
Excellent: the material comes from education and teaching practice, and through the elaboration and analysis of work practice, the law of education and teaching is revealed;
Good: the materials are authentic and can reflect the laws and present situation of education and teaching;
General: enumerate some examples in education and teaching, reflecting the general laws of education and teaching;
Unqualified: little contact with reality, empty, false or improper examples.
3. It is enlightening and original, and has guiding significance for education and teaching practice.
Excellent: it can guide the reform of education and teaching, and has achieved remarkable results in improving the quality of education and teaching and improving the efficiency of running schools;
Good: it has certain guiding significance to education and teaching, and proves that its views and practices have a positive effect on education and teaching reform;
General: you can learn from it;
Unqualified: the guiding function is general, or even no guiding function.
4. The language expression is rigorous, fluent and standardized.
Excellent: rigorous argumentation, strong logic, incisive language and a certain literary talent;
Good: clear analysis and fluent language;
General: the language is basically fluent, and I can basically express my views;
Unqualified: the logic is chaotic, the structure is loose, or there are many language diseases, and the words are not satisfactory.
According to the above appraisal standards, the papers are comprehensively considered and graded accordingly.
Three, one of the following circumstances, the paper is also classified as unqualified:
1, plagiarism or plagiarism;
I didn't write the article myself, but asked someone else to write it.
Four, in order to ensure the fairness and scientificity of paper appraisal, each paper submitted for review is reviewed by two people respectively, and then the comprehensive evaluation grade is written. If the appraisal opinions of the papers cannot be unified, they shall be reviewed by the review leading group.
Five, the bureau title evaluation leading group will be fully responsible for the evaluation of the title of the paper, and deal with related matters in the evaluation of the paper.
Six, the paper reviewer, if there is any violation of discipline, once verified, will be dealt with seriously.
The final interpretation right of this opinion belongs to the bureau-level title evaluation leading group.
The final interpretation right of this opinion belongs to the bureau-level title evaluation leading group.
The evaluation of the title of senior thesis shows that the representative work selected by this comrade belongs to the field of mathematics teaching in middle schools of this major. Through specific problem-solving examples, accurate and rigorous analysis and in-depth excavation, a broader conclusion is drawn, and the common problem-solving strategies of middle school permutation and combination are summarized in detail. The typical conclusion of this paper has great reference value for middle school mathematics teachers to break through the teaching difficulties of permutation and combination, and has certain contribution to optimizing mathematics classroom teaching, reducing students' academic burden and improving teaching quality in an all-round way. This shows that the teacher has a deep research on problem-solving teaching and middle school mathematics teaching, and has reached a higher level. The language of the article is concise, the expression is standardized, the logic is strong, it comes from practice and can guide practice, which completely reaches the academic level that high school teachers should have.
After appraisal, the representative work "Common Problem Solving Strategies of Arrangement and Combination" compiled by this comrade belongs to the field of mathematics teaching in middle schools of this major. Focusing on classroom teaching, this paper studies and explores specific problem-solving skills from the perspective of micro-methodology, summarizes the strategies and principles of problem-solving, and refines the ideas and methods of problem-solving. This paper discusses how and why to solve this problem, which embodies the practice of mathematics teaching in middle schools and is innovative. The popularization of the law of solving problems in this paper is of great reference value and guiding significance for cultivating students' mathematical thinking ability and improving mathematics teachers' classroom teaching level in problem-solving teaching, and is of popularization significance, which fully meets the requirements of applying for high school.
The evaluation of thesis topics requires general knowledge.
All relevant units:
According to the job requirements of the title of the Municipal Education Bureau, the education and teaching papers of 20 1 1 applicants for intermediate teacher positions were appraised, and the relevant matters concerning the application for education and teaching papers are hereby notified as follows:
1. Articles providing evaluation must be papers, special reviews, investigation reports, etc. It is written around the actual situation of primary and secondary education and teaching, and it must be written after assuming the primary title. The number of words in the papers applying for intermediate positions is generally around 2500 words. Works are not used as appraisal materials, but only as application materials when applying for professional titles.
2. It is not allowed to indicate the unit and author on the papers that provide appraisal. It must be printed on paper with No.4 Song Style (heading No.3 font) and 16K, and proofread correctly in duplicate. Each test paper is accompanied by a uniformly printed paper assessment form. Papers published in newspapers and magazines do not need originals or award certificates.
The number of papers sent for reference this time is no more than three for each teacher. Papers to be identified need to fill in the "Wuxi Primary and Secondary Education and Teaching Papers Appraisal Form", and the appraisal fee for each paper is 50 yuan.
4. The deadline for applying for the title of intermediate thesis is March 22nd, 20 1 1 year, and it will not be accepted after the deadline.
5, each unit to declare the intermediate teacher's thesis review, the relevant content of the thesis review should be based on? 20 10 paper appraisal roster? Fill in the format and pass? Message management? Pass it on to Liu Jianwen.
6. The results of this appraisal report are valid for 3 years.
All units are requested to widely publicize the spirit of this notice to teachers, mobilize teachers to actively carry out teaching and research activities, and carefully write educational and teaching papers.
?
20xx March 1
Thesis title works evaluation form