2. Try to describe the relationship between the basic rights and basic obligations of China citizens. A: Basic rights are a comprehensive rights system determined by the constitutional legal norms. The so-called basic right refers to the right endowed by the Constitution to show the important position of the right subject in the right system. As the right form of constitutional adjustment, basic rights are in the core and basic position in the whole right system. Basic obligations refer to the legal responsibilities that citizens must perform according to the Constitution. In social life, citizens need to perform different forms of legal obligations, among which the obligation of primary significance to the country, that is, the obligation that has a significant impact on citizens' lives, constitutes a constitutional obligation. The basic obligations of citizens determine their political and legal status in national life. The relationship between basic rights and basic obligations is both the same and different at different levels. (1) The dialectical unity relationship between basic rights and basic obligations Regarding the relationship between citizens' basic rights and obligations, Marxism holds that "there is no right without obligation, and there is no obligation without right". This universal principle has been recognized by the modern concept of human rights. As the Universal Declaration of Human Rights emphasizes: "Everyone has obligations to society", and everyone is only limited by law when exercising his rights and freedoms, and the only purpose of determining this limitation is to ensure that the rights and freedoms of others are duly recognized and respected. The unity of rights and obligations is determined by the social nature of citizens' basic rights. Because human rights can only exist in social relations between people. In the relationship between individuals, groups, individuals and groups, and society, one subject enjoys a certain right, which means that other subjects are required to respect and not infringe this right. Otherwise, no one's rights can be realized and guaranteed. However, rights and obligations can be separated. Because rights and obligations are two relatively independent concepts and categories. In practice, some subjects may only enjoy rights and not undertake obligations, while others may only undertake obligations and not enjoy rights. (2) The value of primary and secondary relationship between basic rights and basic obligations Some scholars believe that basic rights and basic rights should be rights-based, because in the relationship between rights and obligations, rights are the purpose, obligations are the means, rights are the basis and significance of obligations, and the purpose of setting obligations by law is to guarantee the realization of rights. There is also a view that law, as a means of social control and regulation, has two forms of regulation technically: giving rights or powers and imposing obligations. In contrast, the latter is a more effective way. Simply declaring civil rights is not enough to prevent the corruption of state public officials and major decision-making mistakes of organs at all levels, but setting mandatory norms and decision-making procedures for the behavior of public officials is conducive to the effective control of management organizations by society. In fact, rights and obligations are the core issues of law, and there is no question of who is the standard between them. It is meaningless to discuss who is the standard without the essence of who is entitled to rights and who is entitled to obligations by law. The right-based theory absolutes the relationship between rights and obligations and establishes the main position of rights. From the perspective of Marxist philosophy,