1, the argument is clear and the argument is strong.

Argument is the soul of the paper, and the key of the paper lies in conception, that is, what you want to demonstrate, that is, argument. The process of discussion is the process of clarifying arguments. It is necessary to make the viewpoint objective, clear, profound and unique, and to clearly express the essence and law of the event, and not to be vague, ambiguous or follow suit.

Of course, a clear argument needs to be supported by arguments, which is the process of argument. Arguments must be closely linked with arguments, serve arguments and unify arguments with arguments.

Argumentation should adopt logical and scientific argumentation methods, whether it is citation, example or comparison. It's not enough to just put forward a quotation theory or list arguments. Be sure to analyze clearly, put the facts clearly, and explain the truth thoroughly. You can't speculate unreasonably and arbitrarily.

2. The subject and object are distinct and the details are appropriate.

The discussion of this paper is to complete the rational analysis of the research results of this paper by comparing with relevant documents, and it is necessary to quote relevant documents (arguments) reasonably and appropriately. But the train of thought must be clear, the research results are the main body of "discussion" and the relevant cited documents are the objects of "discussion".

In the process of specific discussion, don't take the lead and affect the whole body, analyze the results of other people's related literature with great color, so that the results of this research become weightless, and don't bully the customer with the main body and ignore the results of the literature.

The specific narrative methods are: closely surrounding the research results of this paper, aiming at the research purpose of this paper, objectively and reasonably explaining and explaining the results; Cite other people's literature to demonstrate the advantages and disadvantages of this study; Explain the significance and value of this study.

3, objective and fair, pros and cons * * *

Objectivity and justice are the most important factors in writing a thesis. As the most reasonable "discussion" part of the paper, if it is unfair, the value of the whole article will be doubted.

Objectivity and justice require the author to have strict thinking, strict logic and systematic knowledge in the process of "discussion", and adhere to the universal contact and dialectical method to analyze and understand problems. Instead of speculating and arbitrarily relying on your own subjective likes and dislikes.