The film was made exactly like the newspaper. First, 1968, a worker in a meat factory held the director hostage in the office, and an American female journalist Susan and a French director were also trapped. Revolution is not a dinner party (this is the most memorable quotation of Chairman Mao by western directors, which was quoted by bertolucci in "Live a Dream", Sergio? Leon also quoted it in "Revolutionary Past", and Godard also quoted this sentence), but the scene of class struggle in the film seems to be very gentle in the eyes of China audience. The workers let the factory director run around the toilet to experience the pain of limited convenience, and the factory director smashed a piece of glass in a hurry to solve the problem-have we seen too much and listened too much? It's like a little humor. But of course, the evil of the bourgeoisie and the pain of the proletariat really become a part of art because the "narrative way" in the past is too simple, and they are no longer in reality. -Godard put this part of the content in a plane, and the details and scenes are still very ironic and infectious. Then 1968' s revolution passed quickly, and 1972 was singing and dancing again, just like the commercials made by the director now. Susan is in pain. She wants to leave.

In the tidbits of the disc, there is a letter from Godard to Jane? Fonda's letter. He said that the photos taken by Fonda in Vietnam (Fonda is a famous anti-war figure) should be used as a poster for the film at Cannes Film Festival. Where did Susan go in the movie? What can Susan all over the world do? Maybe it's Jane. What Fang Da did just gave Godard an answer. But this answer is still not the answer in life. The inner entanglement of intellectuals, like this long letter of Godard, is constantly entangled in the reading of "meaning".

The word "meaning" is too expensive If you don't pay attention to "meaning", nothingness and vulgarity will easily invade individual life, but if it is foreign "meaning", it will make people wary. I don't know how this meaning will advance individual life. For the son of a bourgeois like Godard, becoming a leftist is an opposite dimension for him to establish himself. His pursuit of "meaning" is an intellectual logic deduction from the inside out and eventually becomes an ethical appeal. And his greatest strength, of course, lies in his simple and powerful lens, cutting and counterpoint between sound and painting-every detail can be separated and a little "meaning" can be discussed. However, the most rare thing about him is that he did not abandon life in his "thesis". Everyone is still a specific person under his lens, and can communicate and understand * * *. Susan was depressed and quarreled with her boyfriend. She knocked over a teapot lid on purpose and then kicked her boyfriend. But how "elegant" does this detail belong to Jane? A leftist like Fonda. Ge Daer's grip is so sweet!