Establishing arguments is the premise of writing argumentative essays. Arguments in argumentative essays must be clear and correct. To be distinctive means to clearly express what is positive, what is negative and what is in favor, and to comment on something or a phenomenon with a clear attitude.
Correct, the viewpoint should conform to the objective reality, be reasonable and stand the test of practice. Distinctive and correct are the basic requirements for beginners to write argumentative essays. If we demand a higher standard, the argument should be innovative and meaningful.
The so-called novelty means having your own opinions and not always repeating others' opinions; The so-called deep meaning can not only grasp the superficial phenomenon, but also reveal the essence and law of things.
In an argumentative essay, after putting forward an argument, you must also cite facts and tell the truth to prove the correctness of the argument. These facts and reasons that prove arguments are arguments. Facts as arguments include historical facts and statistical data.
In order to ensure the authenticity of the facts, the cited materials should be sourced and checked. As an argument, truth should be tested by practice and its correctness should be recognized by people.
Marxism–Leninism and Mao Zedong Thought are truths that have been tested and proved by revolutionary practice. They are very convincing and can be used as arguments. The principles, laws and formulas in natural science, as well as the speeches of some people with lofty ideals who have contributed in history or real life, can also be used as arguments.
However, you should be careful when quoting, and you can't take it out of context, let alone distort it. At the same time, it is necessary to deeply understand the spiritual essence of relevant expositions and make them complete and accurate. Use arguments to prove an argument.
There are several basic requirements: first, the argument must be able to tightly buckle the argument, serve the argument, and achieve the unity of views and materials.
If establishing an argument solves the problem of what to prove and choosing an argument solves the problem of what to prove, then the process of argument should solve the problem of how to prove. This part of knowledge has two main points, one is to arrange the structure, and the other is to choose the argumentation method.
According to the academic hall, although writing a paper is a painful process, there are still many places to pay attention to:
1, "I" should use less vulgar words. The author's first reaction to using the teacher less is like plagiarism, and the standard usage is himself.
2. Exclamation marks and question marks should be used less. The thesis is academically rigorous. The exclamation point is too close to the network language and does not meet the standard. Question marks can only be used at the end, and can be used less in other places, because the paper is not an emotional article.
3. Pareto sentences and joke quotations should be used as much as possible, because the papers are rigorous, and even the papers of the humanities society should pay attention to the logic of the language.
4. Pay attention to the citation standard, because the paper is rigorous, even the humanities and social sciences papers should pay attention to the logic of the language.
5. Direct citation shall not exceed 65,438+05%-25% of the full text (now key universities are generally changed to 5% because of the Zhai Tianlin incident, and foreign universities are not so strict), and indirect citation shall not exceed 30%. Most of the quotations focus on the opening of the topic, research summary and theoretical research. Try not to correct the back part of the paper on a large scale, and some professors will pay special attention and take it seriously.
6. Footnotes, footnotes or footnotes, say the important things three times. If the footnote is not marked, the teacher will usually type it back and change the format first. How to label footnotes refers to the paper format templates of various schools.
7. The main structure of the paper should conform to the specifications.
8. Deny that predecessors should be polite and modest, so that all you can cite are academic giants. Of course, you don't have to listen to them. As a result, the teacher was annoyed and changed it for no reason, once, twice, three times and n times.
9. References should correspond to the sentences in the paper one by one and be marked with specifications. Many students' references are copied casually and can't correspond to the text at all. Why should the teacher look at it so seriously? It is a respect for your efforts in the paper. Then the problem is coming. As an unruly student, should we also respect the teacher's feelings? Don't insult the teacher's IQ.
10, thank you words should be written carefully, and don't copy them indiscriminately. 70% of the thank-you words are formulaic and understandable, but 30% of them are not even realistic. A little snack can definitely save you a lot of review time. Because many teachers in the office have talked about this problem, most of them think that it will be unreasonable to modify it ... or just find a reason.