The news of students falling from buildings will undoubtedly arouse widespread concern in society. After all, every household has students, and educating students has always been a long-standing problem. How to help students improve their grades while ensuring their mental health has become an urgent contradiction for many parents. The reason why the "Chengdu 49 Middle School Student Incident" quickly detonated the network was that the student fell off the building, which was a key word, and the six doubts behind the student's fall further pushed the case to the forefront of public opinion. So what are the six specific doubts? Let's see:

First, the situation on the day of the student's accident happened to be Mother's Day. According to the memory of the child's mother, the child was very happy on the day of the incident and sent a message to wish her a happy holiday. From the mother's point of view, the child's heart is very healthy and there is no suicidal tendency. However, from the school's point of view, she reported that her children were prone to depression, and she also reflected on it. This is a contradiction and a big question. What was the cause of the child's death?

Second, the situation of students' accidents. It has been two hours since the child's accident, and the mother of the child has just received the phone call. It is said that the school should inform the guardian at the first time. Schools should be formal institutions and have received professional training. According to the conventional understanding, there should be no such omission, so the doubts behind the two-hour delay in notifying parents need to be further decrypted.

Third, the teacher who informed the students Two hours after the accident, the parents received a phone call from the school teacher to inform the parents that the student had an accident. At first glance, the parents had a strange phone number, that is, they had never contacted the parents before, and the child had such a big accident. It was supposed to be the role of the head teacher to inform the parents, but the head teacher did not appear and a strange teacher informed the parents. This is another doubt in this case.

Four. Surveillance On the day of the murder in China today, it can be said that surveillance is everywhere, but when it comes to coincidence, we will applaud. Many crime scenes just happen to have no monitoring or blind spots, but the suspect in this case is not monitoring, but the monitoring school that obviously has monitoring at the time of the crime can't provide it effectively, which is also a key point to ignite parents' anger and trigger public opinion.

Verb (abbreviation of verb) The dispute between the son of the chemistry teacher and the deceased can be said to be quite enthusiastic on the Internet, but the specific truth is unknown. Legend has it that the deceased replaced the son of the chemistry teacher, which led to a murder case. Of course, this is also the key to whether this case is a criminal case. I believe that the positive police will give the final answer.

6. A notice from the school can be said to be very fast. It can be seen that this institution of the school still lacks a good document, but the notice clearly points out that the deceased committed suicide and the psychological education of the school is flawed and needs to be further improved. But is this really the case? Why go early when you know there's a problem? Do you know how to reflect after death?