First of all, morality and immorality are endowed by culture. If you change your country, you will change your culture. In my opinion, honor and disgrace is a "Pavlov" reaction influenced by culture. In another culture, the standards of honor and shame are different.
For example, in The Neurotic Personality of Our Time, it is mentioned that if an Indian boy "tells us that he has a certain illusion, we call him a psychopath, which is a big risk. Because in these Indian cultures, the experience of illusion and illusion is considered as a special gift, which comes from the happiness of the gods. These hallucinations and illusions are deliberately aroused, and those who have them are considered to enjoy some special prestige. In our culture, if someone claims to have talked with his late grandfather for several hours, he will be considered to have neurosis or mental illness; In some Indian tribes, this communication with ancestors is a recognized model.
So different cultures and laws have different standards of honor and disgrace. Like Mozart and Mo Bosang, they all think that syphilis is the honor of genius, and they are proud of it, which makes us puzzled.
Secondly, party constitution is party constitution, national law is national law, morality is morality, and rights are rights. It doesn't have to be equal Just as Gauls are Gauls, Yamato people are Yamato people, and Indians are Indians, Gauls will never be Yamato people, but when Gauls arrive in Japan, they must abide by and respect local customs and constraints. What Gauls agree to become a custom can become laws or traditions and opinions in Gaul countries, but in Yamato countries, Yamato people have their own laws, traditions and opinions to agree to become a custom. Just as "suicide" is even close to completion in Japanese tradition (Zhang Wenxun), in the Western Bible, suicide is the most unforgivable crime, and people who commit suicide will go to hell after death. In our traditional culture, parents are physically weak and can't hurt themselves at will.
It can be seen that under the influence of different cultures, different opinions and behaviors will naturally arise, and finally different rules and regulations will appear to restrict them.
Finally, I want to say that the changes in the world are also affecting culture, and ultimately affecting people's ideas and spirit. For example, the "lost generation" represented by Hemingway after World War I and the "decadent generation" represented by Kerouac after World War II brought the sensitive young artists no longer disillusionment of faith, but panic like ants and fear of doomsday arrival (On the Road, Li Jihong). Now we can't feel people's worries at that time. It is precisely because of the corpses and ruins of war and the danger of atomic bombs that experts in nuclear war predict that the voice of national mobilization is too weak to create any atmosphere. Instead, it is the anxiety caused by economic development. We have shifted from the fear of war massacre to buying a house, paying off the loan, seeing a doctor and educating our children. In the final analysis, the cultural atmosphere has changed, and the money worship that has arisen from it has naturally become a new belief and strength. The reason for anxiety is just a change of object.
Finally, I want to say that the influence of culture on people is normal in the eyes of the parties concerned, but difficult to understand in the eyes of outsiders. Although people are all human beings, can the law be the same? No matter whether we look at foreigners, foreigners, ancient people or future people, we don't have to dwell on laws or rules, just like it was illegal to kill cattle in the Han, Tang and Song Dynasties, but it is not now. Everyone is the same person, and the law is different.
In different cultures, morality is morality and justice is justice, just like a person who is dressed and naked, but it is strange to get dressed in the shower. Running naked in the street is like playing hooligans, with different places and different horizons.
When talking about history, we should analyze it from a historical perspective. Are morality, memory, kindness and kindness the characteristics of history? Just like dinosaurs went extinct and insects stayed, is it the ruthlessness of insects and the sorrow of dinosaurs? How to deal with the erosion of money worship? I think the answers to these topics are in their own hearts.