1, how to extract ideas from materials?

Generally speaking, we should carefully read and analyze the materials, grasp the essence of the materials, grasp the center of the materials, and grasp the central sentences and key sentences.

Specifically, it can be analyzed according to the material properties:

(1) If the material is about people, we can analyze the characters' personalities according to their language and actions, and refine our opinions according to their personalities;

(2) If the material is about something, we should find out the meaning of the event and refine our views according to its meaning;

(3) If the given materials are some phenomena, it is necessary to analyze the essence of the phenomena and refine opinions according to their essence;

(4) If the given material is the result, it is necessary to analyze the reasons for the result and extract your own opinions according to the reasons;

(5) If the material is symbolic, it is necessary to grasp the meaning through the material and refine the point of view according to the meaning.

In addition, the expression of views must be clear and complete, and you can use simple sentences, complex sentences, declarative or negative sentences, interrogative sentences and exclamatory sentences.

2. How to write your own topic?

Pay attention to this problem. It is a pity that many candidates did not pay attention to the self-made questions in the exam and deducted 2 points. Suggested topics can be started from the following aspects:

(1) can be formulated as a topic type.

(2) It can be expressed as an argumentative paper.

(3) Signs of discussion can be used, such as "discussion, discussion and feelings".

3. Is there a convenient routine for argumentative writing?

Generally speaking, argumentative writing has a convenient routine, which is what the ancients often said: "from beginning to end." The so-called rise is to cut to the chase and make a point; The so-called commitment is to analyze the argument and point out what will happen if this is the case, and what will happen if it is not; The so-called turn is to turn around and prove the argument with examples, so it is also the main part of the full text; The so-called combination is the end of the full text, echoing the beginning and reaffirming the argument. The benefits of using such a convenient routine are obvious. First, you can save valuable time because you are familiar with it; Secondly, he has regular facial features and is very organized; Third, it will not cause reading ambiguity.

4. When writing an argumentative paper, you won't talk about it, but only give examples to illustrate how to do it.

First, we should read more wonderful argumentative papers, think carefully about how the discussion parts of these papers are organized, developed and led to depth step by step, and "introduced" after repeated comparison and thinking. Second, we should learn to "squeeze toothpaste" and divide the past discussion into several sentences and "squeeze" it out slowly. For example, how do you feel after reading this material for the first time? Read this material carefully? Why do I feel this way? Because …, because of two …, because of three …

5. What should I do if I write an argumentative essay without depth, strength and persuasiveness?

It can be solved by combining argument with refutation. That is, after the positive discussion, imagine a number of different views to question yourself, and then turn to refute. As long as a number of different viewpoints can be refuted one by one, the depth and intensity of the discussion will be there. After the positive discussion, it can also be discussed from the opposite side, and at the same time, it can be discussed in connection with reality to make the discussion profound and powerful.

6. What are the similarities and differences between argumentative writing and post-reading feeling?

Similarities: (1) There are narration, discussion and combination of narration and discussion.

(2) Argumentation, argumentation and argumentative writing are inseparable.

(3) Don't start a new stove without material and original text.

Differences: the "feeling" of argumentative writing is the "shining point" of the article, which is the most core, essential and intriguing place; Reading after reading "reading" refers to the overall understanding of the article, with the focus on "feeling", which is not comprehensive, but has the focus and varies from person to person. "Feeling" is the breakthrough and starting point.

7. What are the similarities and differences between short comments and post-reading?

Short comments are short and pithy comments, which can praise new things and advanced ideas, criticize backward phenomena and wrong tendencies, and criticize reactionary words and deeds. The outstanding feature is short, ranging from several thousand words in length to one or two hundred words in short.

Pay attention to: (1) the topic is small and specific, and it is often "one thing, one discussion". On the matter, analyze a matter, a problem and an idea in detail, explain a truth, and sometimes write big problems, but find a small angle in big problems and take a small one from big problems; (2) Reasoning should stick to the center. If you want to explain the truth clearly in writing a short essay, you must stick to the center, focus on the facts, aim at the core of reasoning, ask questions directly and make a clean summary; (3) The language should be concise and vivid.

The feeling after reading is to write a discussion-oriented article about the experience, sentiment and educational enlightenment after reading. After writing, you should pay attention to: (1) thoroughly understand the original text and grasp the essence; (2) Grasp the key points and talk about feelings; (3) Connecting with reality and extending it; (4) Rebate the original text and collect the full text.

8. How to write an argumentative essay in accurate language?

In order to truly express one's views and sufficient arguments, argumentative essays need accurate language and extract appropriate words from the vast amount of words.

Whether the language is accurate or not is sometimes related to one's ideological style and writing style. In terms of expression, he is bluffing, flashy, excessively worded and arbitrarily piled up. In addition to his lack of language accomplishment, he sometimes has problems with his style of thinking and writing. Therefore, when cooperating, we should pay attention to: (1) The words should be appropriate, not exaggerated or narrow-minded. (2) Don't be vague and flashy. (3) Avoid rigid language.