Reliability is only relative, mainly depending on what kind of duplicate checking system your school uses. Choosing a duplicate checking system that is consistent with the requirements of the school is reliable. If the school requires using HowNet to check the duplicate, it is more reliable to find HowNet directly. This is also a one-step modification for yourself, and the efficiency will be much higher.

1. If you don't use the duplicate checking system required by the school, you will waste time and money.

If your school requires the use of HowNet, because the data of HowNet is authoritative in China, and you use other systems to check the duplicate, other duplicate checking systems may be wasting money, because the content you want to check is not included, you have to use HowNet to check it again and then modify it; Others use other duplicate checking systems to check duplicates, and the similarity rate is quite high. In fact, HowNet didn't include what you mean, and it took a lot of time to revise it, which is actually a white change compared with HowNet's duplicate checking.

2. It is very efficient to directly choose the same system as the requirements of the school.

This situation is especially suitable for duplicate checking of graduate papers. If the school requires tens of thousands of words and hundreds of thousands of words of articles, they must go through the same system test. This word is too many, and it must be revised in one step. If you use other systems to test the modification, it will take several days. Finally, we checked with the same duplicate checking system required by the school and found that it was changed for nothing. What was it like at that time?

Besides, it is not true that you said that many Wang Zhi repeated inspections. There are fakes on the market, but you can find a regular organization to re-inspect, such as us.