1. For the master, if the paper is published in junk journals, it will affect the evaluation of scholarships and job hunting. Compared with other publishing cores and SCI, under the same conditions, there is no advantage, and a good journal will definitely get more points in the school evaluation.
If you are a student, I suggest you try to publish more high-level periodical papers, which can become a competitive advantage. If you really can't write it, you must improve your professional knowledge and practical ability.
3. There are many chaotic phenomena in the publication of the article, which corrupt the academic atmosphere, damage the interests of real scholars, make academic research more impetuous, and the sonata of academic innovation is in danger of "out of tune".
4. Some parts of China have begun to explore the reform of academic evaluation system. At the end of 20 16, Liaoning province issued a policy to encourage researchers to transform their achievements, rather than just "discussing heroes with papers"; This year, Beijing changed the evaluation of professional titles from "only papers" to "menu style", so that people can choose the representative achievements that best reflect their own ability level as the main content of evaluation.
Extended data:
Matters needing attention
1. The determination of core journals in China mainly adopts bibliometrics and expert consultation.
2. As far as editors are concerned, they can learn from core journals. As far as readers are concerned, establishing the consciousness of core periodicals can clarify the value orientation and improve their reading level. For example, students majoring in language and literature should first read core journals such as China Language and Literature Review, instead of putting the cart before the horse.