Legal analysis: the improvement of trial quality and efficiency is directly proportional to the optimization of trial resources. Only by taking trial as the center and rationally optimizing the allocation of trial resources can the workload and psychological pressure of front-line judges be effectively reduced. In this regard, we should allocate trial resources from four aspects to improve trial quality and efficiency. First, there must be a strong trial team. It is necessary not only to effectively gather outstanding judicial talents to the front line of the trial through the reasonable deployment and selection mechanism of personnel, but also to pay attention to the mutual collocation of old, middle and young judicial forces, so as to form a reasonable trial age structure and avoid the phenomenon that judges are fragmented. Second, rationally define judicial power and judicial administrative power. Third, straighten out the relationship between the sole court and the collegiate bench. Fourth, further improve the system of judicial committees and judges' meetings. First of all, we should change the functional orientation. The main function should be to summarize the trial experience and study the macro-issues in the trial work, such as unifying the judgment rules of similar cases. When discussing cases, we should establish a corresponding filtering mechanism to limit the scope of discussion to the legal application of major difficult and complicated cases and the handling of major and complicated cases involving national diplomacy, security and social stability.

Legal basis: People's Republic of China (PRC) Civil Procedure Law.

Article 198 If the presidents of the people's courts at all levels find that there are errors in the legally effective judgments, rulings and conciliation statements of their own courts, and think that a retrial is necessary, they shall submit them to the judicial committee for discussion and decision. The Supreme People's Court has the right to send back the legally effective judgments, rulings and conciliation statements of local people's courts at all levels and people's courts at higher levels or order the people's courts at lower levels to try them again if errors are found.

Article 199 If a party considers that a legally effective judgment or ruling is wrong, it may apply to a people's court at the next higher level for retrial; A case with a large number of people or both citizens may also apply to the people's court that originally tried the case for retrial. If a party applies for a retrial, the execution of the judgment or ruling shall not be stopped.