Reading guidance, which is a basic skill for weekly editors, is also a sufficient means to improve the quality of periodical editors. In peer review, some papers with high academic value can generally gain the knowledge of editors, but sometimes there are differences. For the same paper, different editors will put forward different or even diametrically opposite opinions. Where is the original wind? This is probably related to the different evaluation principles and standards. Of course, there are no unified seven criteria for evaluating the academic value of a paper. The content of the paper is different, the major is different, and the genre is different. It is difficult to measure rice with a ruler. We must review and evaluate it realistically from different professional characteristics and academic status. However, no matter what kind of professional articles, Du Zong's evaluation direction _ L still needs to have the same evaluation principles. My humble opinion on this valley is for your reference. 1 evaluation criteria The standard for evaluating the academic value of a paper should be the same as evaluating other phenomena, that is, the contribution to the development of the productivity of the supplementary society is uncertain, which is the productivity standard. An article that acts as a hillside for the development of social productive forces has high academic value; On the contrary, it is low. Of course, unlike an industry or technological invention, a paper is not linked to economic benefits, and its value can obviously show meters. Leisure, apart from applied research and general academic theoretical articles, is only used to provide readers with knowledge theories and ideas, put forward personal unique opinions and opinions, and change people's wrong understanding and deepening.