First, there are many reasons why contributors are rejected, but most contributors encounter language problems. As we are a non-English-speaking country, we lack a certain understanding of the writing norms of SCI papers, and English manuscripts are difficult to understand in language. Some sentences can't be understood when reviewing the manuscript, which affects the understanding of the meaning of the article. In order to avoid this influence, the author, that is, the author of the paper, can find a suitable SCI revision team editor to help complete the manuscript revision according to his own needs.
Second, in addition to the language problems mentioned above, the most traditional way to modify SCI papers is self-examination, and your own papers must be what you know best. Through repeated reading, at least you can ensure that there are no language expression problems, such as fluent sentences and coherent context. You should pay attention to some skills when reviewing your own papers, such as using some revision symbols reasonably, sorting out the revised contents, keeping the revision clean and tidy, and avoiding unnecessary time loss caused by confusing words. Time is money.
Third, in addition, the most practical method is to let others modify it for you. After all, one's own ability is limited, and the authorities are confused, and the bystanders are clear. They can use their tutors or sci paper revision teams of related majors, such as editing and compiling, to provide a good revision plan. An experienced tutor or team can correct the shortcomings of your paper from a professional perspective, provide the data you need but are difficult to obtain, and increase the persuasiveness of your paper.