-inscription
My world, my incomparable, what kind of world this is, everything is so beautiful and quiet. If separated by a layer of glass, everything is the most beautiful. This is what Xiao Si said, and I came up with it myself. But because he is a celebrity, what others say is like quoting classics, but it is really what I think, or what I think. So, what about you? Do you have this? Have you ever had such an experience?
Everyone has an unparalleled beautiful world of their own. It is such a world that you can take off all the disguises and return to the original you. Looking back on that summer, it was particularly long because of cicada singing, like the long end of cicada singing. We all don't know when this slightly empty summer will pass. But in a blink of an eye, this summer has really passed, leaving behind not melancholy but hope.
When I think of the grassland, small petals are scattered all over the floor, smelling a slight fragrance. The chrysanthemums there are beautiful. Do what you think, don't force yourself.
I also forgot whether my world is quiet or not. Everyone has a different world, different angles, different ideas, and everything is different. So what is the world in my eyes? I don't even know. I like philosophy. Philosophy is not difficult, but everyone has wisdom from the heart. Everyone will become a philosopher if possible. This is a fact.
Meditation for a long time, I seem to have returned to my original self, like philosophy, ancient prose, taekwondo ... I have grown up, yes, I can't play at the initial time like a child, nor can I have such eager eyes, but I have been trying to keep that childlike innocence. I don't know what I'm writing. I just hope I can leave something for myself and the world. Perhaps, I won't leave anything behind, and I will hold a "goat crossing a wooden bridge" competition in Limin School like dust. When two people meet on a narrow wooden bridge, they need to do their best to throw each other off the wooden bridge and walk alone to win. But in this competition, two clever players came up with a wonderful idea. They cooperated with each other, hugged each other, turned around and changed places, and all crossed the bridge. This novel approach caused an uproar: supporters applauded the eclectic approach of the two players and thought that they had achieved a "win-win"; Opponents believe that the two players violated the rules of the game. And I think: although the two players' practices are somewhat innovative, they also exploit the loopholes in the rules. Such a "win-win" is absolutely unacceptable.
There are three rules in the world: emotion, reason and law. From the point of view of "law", there is no clear stipulation in the competition rules about the behavior of two people crossing the single-plank bridge together. Since there are no detailed rules, there are no "rules", let alone breaking them. "Permission without prohibition". As the executors of the rules and the participants in the competition, it is really innovative for the two athletes to seize the loopholes in the rules and cooperate with each other to realize the transformation of their respective interests. But from the ethical point of view, the behavior of these two athletes is obviously untenable, and such a "win-win" is just unacceptable. First of all, the significance of the competition itself is to realize the survival of the fittest. If everyone is like this, the strong and the weak can't be separated, then the game itself will lose its meaning. Secondly, the audience at the scene spent time and energy watching the game. What they want to see is a real game, a real competition. If athletes take advantage of the rules to protect their own interests and promote a meaningless inferior competition, obviously, the interests of the audience will be infringed.
In today's sports world, such things can be seen everywhere. A few years ago, in the Super League, fake gambling prevailed. One of the important reasons is that clubs and teams consider their own interests and ignore professional ethics and professional norms. A club owner once said: "If two clubs with similar strength are tied at home and away, not only will both players work hard, but the two teams will only get two points from each other;" And if the two teams discuss it in advance, I'll let you stay at your house and you let me stay at my house. Not only the home fans will be happy, but also the athletes of both sides will not be tired, and both sides can get three points from each other. Why not? "However, it is this long-standing practice of' why not do it' that undermines the normal order of football in China. The original intention of our professional league is to let players improve their level by playing more games, constantly learning from each other and fierce confrontation. If our players participate in professional leagues at the expense of their professional ethics and professional conduct, all they think about is how to get a job through speculation and achieve the so-called "win-win" through mutual understanding. How can we improve the level of our athletes? We are used to "fake fighting" at home. When we need "real swords and guns" to participate in international competitions, how can our men's soccer team realize the grand dream of "rushing out of Asia and going to the world" with full spirit and professional sportsmanship?
20 12 London Olympic Games, China badminton team had a shocking defeat. Yu Yang and Wang Xiaoli, women's doubles players, swept the gold and silver medals in order to prevent themselves from meeting their teammates in advance in the semi-finals. They openly ignored sports ethics and the feelings of the audience, and took advantage of the loopholes in the competition rules to deliberately lose to a pair of South Korean players in the final round of the group stage. Because of the chain reaction of this game, there was also a deliberate loss in another game. The audience spent money and time buying tickets to watch a wonderful badminton game, but what they saw was who made more mistakes in the two games, compared with the stupid game in which the other side sent out the net and the net. Question: Is this competition healthy? Isn't this kind of competition very bad for the development of badminton?