Argument between individual and collective 1 One's strength is limited, while the collective's strength is infinite.
A person, like a chopstick, no matter how hard you try, you will never pick up the leaves on the plate. A person is like a big tree. When the storm comes, no matter how strong you are, you will still be uprooted. A person is a person, lonely and helpless, even if placed in the sun, still can not feel the warmth of spring.
We have all heard the stories of three monks. We all know that one monk has water to drink and three monks have no water to drink. A monk here looks like one of us, but these three monks are by no means a group. Judging from its number, there are three people, just a "collection". These three monks only care about their own petty profits, regardless of everyone's interests. Among them, as long as someone plays less once, no one can do it and no one can drink much water. They never consider others, so they are not a group. Although the three of them live together, their bodies are very close, and even when they sleep, they are covered with the same quilt, but their hearts are always thinking about their own interests and their hearts are getting farther and farther away.
There is also a group of ants. Although there are thousands of them, they are a group. When the fire broke out, it quickly spread to their nest. And they are a collective, a collective, and the first thing that comes to mind is not themselves, but everyone. So, in the flame, they quickly get close together. They hold each other's bodies with their hands and feet and curl up into a ball. They wrap their blood layer by layer in the innermost part. Then, in the flame, they rolled down from a height and rushed out of the encirclement of the flame. Listening to the crackle of the flame, dozens of ants are dying every minute. The ants in the outer layer are using their bodies to block the fire for the ants in the inner layer, and they leave the hope of life to the ants in the inner layer. And the ants inside left the hope of life to the ants inside. The ants outside died without exception, but the fire of their race remained without exception. They are a collective, because their wishes are consistent with the collective, so in the fire, the hope of their population was preserved.
The group is a pair of chopsticks. As long as you are integrated into the group, you can taste the food you want smoothly. Collective is a forest, and no matter how big the storm is, it can't destroy your home. The collective is not made up of countless individuals, it is a whole that connects your hearts together. It is really a whole, and it doesn't feel cold even in winter.
Individual and Collective Argument Article 2 A collective is a combination of individuals, and individuals and organizations that raise their hands form a system, and this group accommodates all the abilities of individuals.
Individuals and collectives are like thin threads and ropes. Fragile threads are twisted together to become tough and wear-resistant. Monofilaments don't make a line, and single trees don't make a forest. Similarly, the collective strength is stronger than the individual strength. Sun Quan in the Three Kingdoms period once said, "If you can use all your strength, you will be invincible in the world." If you can use all your wisdom, you will be fearless of saints. "It takes more than twice as much effort to break two chopsticks together. When two individuals get together, learn from each other and help each other, the effect of 1 plus 1 is greater than 2. A glass of water can't save the car. What about 10 million cups? Therefore, the strength of the collective is often much greater than that of the individual. Individuals cannot exist independently from the collective. This is the universal law of all things. It is said that Buddha Sakyamuni asked his disciples, "Why doesn't a drop of water dry up? "Disciple can't answer, Sakyamuni, you said," Put it in the sea. "When a drop of water leaves the sea, it will evaporate immediately, and it is difficult for individuals to achieve anything without the collective. A person's growth is inseparable from a positive, happy and progressive group. In this group, learning to live, learning to do things, learning from others' strengths, making up for their own shortcomings, and increasing their talents are all training themselves. If you sail far away, the other side is boundless, and you are likely to hit the rocks and die in the sea, and you can overcome all kinds of difficulties and finally reach the ideal other side.
Tolstoy also said: "individuals can't be happy without society, just as plants can't survive if they are thrown into the desert without land." Therefore, when necessary, we should give up our own interests and fulfill the interests of the collective. There was once a story that during the War to Resist US Aggression and Aid Korea, during a latent mission, soldier Qiu was unfortunately hit by enemy incendiary bombs and burned all over by flames. Although there is a river ditch on the side, in order not to expose his goal and affect the overall operational deployment, Qiu remained motionless in the sea of fire until he died gloriously, and exchanged his life for the victory of the whole battle. More deaths were avoided. This is undoubtedly worth learning from. The idea that everyone should do his duty regardless of the individual's loss in safeguarding the collective is not always correct. For example, in order to achieve the goal of national family planning, it is completely contrary to humanitarianism and is not desirable.
The formation of the collective must abandon individualism, and many individuals must work together towards the same goal. Only by uniting as one can we generate and exert infinite power!
Individual and Collective Argument Article 3 The definitions of collective and individual are different. If we assume that the collective is compared to a "big group" and the individual is compared to a "small group", we can look at the problem from the perspective of these two "groups" respectively. If handled properly, they will be compatible with each other. On the contrary, what we can see is another result.
What is "individual", we will think? What does it stand for? Is this "personalized" generalization good or bad? As the name implies, "individual" is a member of this group, that is to say, no matter what you do, it will be related to its honor or disgrace. No matter what you think about "something", it only represents your personal thoughts and opinions.
Relatively speaking, it is easier to understand the meaning of "collective", which represents not one, but a group. In the words of the book: "This is an organized whole pieced together by many people." In this group, it is not only personal glory that is emphasized, because it is also related to this group. The honor won by any "individual" also belongs to everyone in this group. Everyone should also have a sense of team. Only in this way can we win glory for this group.
Take a company as an example! In this large group, every employee should do his own job well in order to make this group do better. But some people are not satisfied with the status quo at all. He will gradually become a "small group" In this case, the company will become fragmented. What shall we do? Individual greed and dissatisfaction will directly affect this collective. Think more about the honor of the collective, you can integrate the individual into the collective, and you won't regret it later.
The same class, everyone has his own post, whether ordinary members or class cadres, have their own responsibilities to complete. Everyone should do their part. In this way, the collective will become orderly, and everyone will be happy although they are busy! If someone takes your place and you really want to go on, you must think it over with your head. Why did the students choose him instead of me? Why does the teacher trust him? Did he do something wrong? If you think of it, you should correct it in time. Unexpectedly, you can consult your teachers and classmates so that you can make progress!
The relationship between the individual and the collective is interdependent, and under the collective, the role of the individual is negligible. How to deal with their relationship depends on how you deal with their relationship!
The fourth article of personal and collective argumentation "An ant comes to move rice, but it can't afford it ... and it's easy to get into the hole." After reading the nursery rhymes above, I can't help thinking, what will the ants do after they move the rice into the hole?
One possibility is to divide the food in the future and share it equally. After eating, let's look for it together. Another possibility is that three little ants who don't agree with each other all want to monopolize the rice grain, so they kill each other. What was the result? Needless to say, all three families lost, and no one ate.
If people were asked which result they would choose, most people would probably choose the first one. However, when money, interests, power and dreams are really in front of people, most people will choose the latter, and they will tell me, "Who says three ants can't eat?" I will be the winner. "Yes, if there are only three ants in the world, if you kill two of them, you will become the master of the world. But the fact is that the world is very big and there are many foreign dangers. Killing your partner is tantamount to weakening your own strength. The ancients said that the skin does not exist, and the hair will be attached. This is a fact. When you think you are the winner, how do you know that foreign enemies will not take the rice you bought with your partner's life? When you finish this meal, will you repeat it? The story of "an ant comes to move rice"; Then, will you be the winner?
Weakening your peers means weakening yourself. Then, you may say, "well, I'll stay in this team and do nothing, okay?" "Doing nothing" just wants to stay in the team, you are dreaming! If, in a team, everyone is like you, just like the molecules that make up matter. If all the molecules rest lazily, will matter still exist? Each of us is an indispensable member of the team. It is the interaction, mutual attraction, mutual concern and mutual encouragement between us that makes our team full of vitality and creativity, and the molecules in this collective will shine brilliantly.
Let's remember the lessons of the Taiping Heavenly Kingdom, trust each other and help each other. You can't let your sharp knife kill your companions and your future.
We should remember the lesson that "three monks have no water to drink", inject fresh water into the collective and ourselves, cast will in the collective and shine my brilliance.
Let us take the unyielding national spirit as the guide and the team spirit as the inspiration. On the team stage, show our youth and let go of our ideals.
Please be a dazzling crystal star in the sky for individuals and teams.