400 words after reading my hometown] 400 words after reading my hometown. People have always used excuses such as "too abstruse" and "difficult to understand" to avoid reading the works of literary masters such as Lu Xun, and I never thought of borrowing them to read. There are 400 words in my hometown. Today, when we were studying the lesson "Young Jumping Horse", Mr. Chen read the original novel "Hometown" by Mr. Lu Xun, which made us feel deeply. I'm afraid it can only be understood that Lu Xun and his partners are not as knowledgeable as Runtu, but after listening to the full text of Hometown, we can understand what Lu Xun wants to express.

Runtu is a key figure. After 20 years of transformation, he has changed from a brave and resourceful little boy to a vulgar and servile servant. What made him change so much? Is it poverty? Or ... we don't know. But from Lu Xun's novels, we can know that in Lu Xun's heart, Runtu has always been a brave, intelligent and lively person, otherwise he would not have thought of the scene that mentioned Runtu. However, when Runtu spoke to Lu Xun, the first word turned out to be "Sir". I believe that Lu Xun's inner shock must have been great at that time. He may have thought about it for thousands of years. But I certainly didn't expect this. According to the standards of feudal society, Runtu should be called Mr. Lu Xun. However, isn't the span from Brother Xun 20 years ago to the master 20 years later too great? The change of the leap soil is obvious, and the years have left traces of vicissitudes on his face and hands. However, the change of appearance is not his biggest change, but his biggest change is his psychological change. Perhaps, his heart still regarded Lu Xun as a fast man, but the society at that time did not allow it; Perhaps, his heart still wants to play with Lu Xun, but he knows that he and Lu Xun have a master-servant relationship. How much affection does a "master" contain? Cowardice or cowardice? Or is it because I haven't seen strangers for a long time? Maybe only flying over the earth knows this. I wonder if my friends who have seen Hometown have noticed. Sister-in-law Yang Er is a supporting role, but she is also one of the roles that have changed a lot. Twenty years ago, she had a reputation as a tofu beauty, but 20 years later, her appearance has been beyond Lu Xun's recognition. For her appearance, Lu Xun found only one adjective-"compass". If only, Yang Er's sister-in-law has become this ugly appearance because her heart is gradually changing. She went to Lu Xun's house and asked for some old furniture. After being rejected by him, she boasted that "the richer she is, the more she refuses to relax, and the richer she will be." This sharp statement is not like what an "Xi-style" person can say, but more like a mixture of food taste and vitriol.

In Hometown, Lu Xun not only pointed out that the changes in his hometown gave people a feeling of melancholy, but also used two representative examples to prove a word-change: Runtu and Yang Er's sister-in-law. No matter the change of hometown or the change of characters, Lu Xun's articles always give people a feeling of implicit justice, especially the last sentence: there is no way in the world, and there must be a way for many people to walk. It is even more unforgettable.

The so-called feeling

It can be the truth or subtle thoughts learned from the book, the thinking and association inspired by the contents of the book, the determination and ideal inspired by reading, and the attack and irony of reading on some ugly phenomena in society. The expression of the feeling after reading is flexible and diverse, which basically belongs to the discussion category, but the writing method is different from the general argumentative essay because it must be based on reading. Write well, have experience, be knowledgeable and have feelings.

First, read the original text.

The feeling of "feeling after reading [1]" is caused by "reading" and is the basis of "feeling". After a cursory reading, you may not even know what the original book says. How can you have a "feeling"? Reading is shallow, of course not deep. Only by reading carefully can we feel something and feel deeply. If you want to read an argumentative essay, you must find out its arguments (opinions and propositions), or criticize any wrong opinions, think about what you are inspired by, and find out what the arguments and conclusions are. If it is a narrative, you should make clear its main plot, how many characters there are, what is their relationship and what is the story. It is also necessary to find out what kind of spiritual quality the work reveals, what kind of social phenomenon it reflects, what thoughts and feelings the author expresses, which chapters of the work are touching, why it is so touching and so on.

Second, be friendly.

As long as you read the original work carefully, an article can be written as a review. If you feel deeply about the center of the original, you can write it as a post-reading, if you feel deeply about other contents of the original, you can also write it as a post-reading, and if you feel about individual sentences, you can also write it as a post-reading. In short, as long as you have feelings about the content of the original, you need to express what you know, so that you can write your thoughts after reading.

Third, choose the right feeling point.

An article can express many feelings, but a comment can only talk about one center, and can never cover everything. So the next step is to screen and compare these feelings, find out the one that you feel the deepest, the latest angle, the most realistic pertinence and the smooth feeling when you write, as the center of review, and then demonstrate it in words.

Fourth, the narrative should be short.

Since the feeling after reading is caused by reading, it is necessary to describe the facts that cause this feeling in the article, and sometimes I need some examples that I associate with it. In a word, the feeling of reading is indispensable, but it is different from the requirement of narrative in narrative. The "narrative" in the narrative pays attention to concrete, vivid and image, while the "narrative" in the post-reading feeling is. The common problem is that the narrative is not concise, but actually becomes a retelling. This is mainly because the author can't grasp the spirit and main points of the part to be quoted, so he can't be concise. Concise means that the fewer words, the better, concise.

Fifth, Lenovo should pay attention to form.

There are many forms of association, such as association (there are similarities between related things), anti-association (there are opposites between related things), association (there are similarities between related things), inheritance association (there are similarities between related things) and similar association (there are similarities between related things).