On the blind evaluation of the Ministry of Education: Since our 20th grade, the proportion of evaluation selected by the Ministry of Education has expanded from 5% to 10%. As far as I know, most of the blind evaluation of master's thesis adopts the double-blind mode, that is, the audited students don't know the relevant information of the reviewer, and the reviewer doesn't know the relevant information of the audited students, and there are one * * * two reviewers (three reviewers in special cases). The 20-level master is still based on 60 points. Students with a score of 60 or above are deemed to have passed the blind test and can participate in the defense. If one of the two evaluation teachers fails, he can't take part in the defense as scheduled. In this case, only one premise can apply for retrial, and another expert must obtain excellent grade to apply for retrial.

I think the standard of experts' examination in the Ministry of Education: after the lottery, I also inquired about the opinions and passing rates of my brothers and sisters at that time. Although the lottery drawn by the Ministry of Education is very risky, if it is passed, it is also insured for the defense (the Ministry of Education has passed, and the school is unlikely to go against the will of its superiors). By sorting out the audit feedback, I will outline the following audit standards.

1 paper attitude; These include the format of the paper, typos and missing words in the paper. Before re-checking, you must read the paper word for word and correct similar low-level mistakes. Such mistakes have nothing to do with level, but only with personal attitude. Attitude mistakes can cover up many flashlights in the paper, remember to remember!

2 paper difficulty; If you can't have both the workload and the difficulty of scientific research, you should also account for the same, so that the evaluation teacher has a feeling of having a certain level of scientific research.

3. The innovation of the paper; These years, a master emphasized that it is really difficult to innovate, and it is very difficult to do a truly innovative thing. My solution to this problem is that people who have written on HowNet don't know much, too many papers are not good, too many papers have no writing significance, and too many papers have no theoretical support. I have to control this by myself and communicate with my tutor more.

4 luck; In fact, it is not too much to put this in the first place. Some students hang up with sci in their hands, and some students spread typos all over the sky. Luck is hard to say. I suggest you do more good deeds and accumulate more virtues.