1. This paper has a novel topic and a unique perspective, which reflects a solid theoretical foundation. In particular, the article can be demonstrated and analyzed in combination with relevant cases, which has certain practical value.

Through the review of the paper, we can see that the author spent a lot of time in collecting data and cases, and also put forward some profound views, but there are still shortcomings in the depth of theory and the citation of some arguments. Generally speaking, this is a qualified paper.

2. The research content is realistic and operable. The topic is a hot social issue with a rigorous logical structure. The views are clearly expressed and the discussion is comprehensive. This language is concise and easy to understand. In the process of argumentation, the principle of professional knowledge can also be well combined with practical problems. But arguments are not enough. Generally speaking, it meets the requirements of graduation thesis.

3. The topic is contemporary and realistic. The structure of the full text is reasonable. The expression of views is basically accurate. The full text closely follows the requirements of the administrative management specialty and fully embodies the characteristics of the administrative management specialty. Check out more related information. But the main deficiency is that there are not many things that belong to their own innovation. Generally speaking, it meets the requirements of graduation thesis.

4. In the whole process of graduation thesis design, students can successfully complete the thesis under the strict requirements of teachers. The structure of the paper is complete, and each part basically conforms to the writing standard of the paper. In order to write this paper well, the author obviously consulted a lot of information, which was fully discussed and clearly organized.

Of course, there are also some shortcomings and areas that need improvement. For example, the knowledge is not wide enough to actively communicate with teachers about the work process. I hope this student will pay attention to these problems in his future work or study and strive for greater improvement and progress.

5. The title of the paper is basically the same as the content of the paper, the structure is basically complete, the language is fluent, and there are no major grammatical errors. The problem is that there are too many full-text quotations and too few analyses, and some "analyses" have traces of plagiarism. It should be said that the materials needed to complete this paper are already available, and the author can analyze and summarize the materials on this basis and draw his own conclusions.