Graduation 2 1 13 Paper submission is to hand in the written paper and wait for review. Usually, the duplicate checking system of 4 102 is used to check the duplicate. The paper is 526 1. PS: Graduation thesis 1653 can be evaluated by using a five-level scoring system, and the school defense committee will finally determine the scoring level according to the scores of defense teams of various departments. Let's give an example: the excellent proportion is generally controlled within 15%, and the excellent proportion does not exceed 65%. Excellent (above 90 points): good (80-89 points): medium (70-79 points): pass (60-69 points): fail (below 59 points, with the following three or more): 1. During my graduation thesis work, my attitude is not serious enough and I have violated discipline. 2. Under the guidance of the teacher, it is still impossible to complete the graduation thesis related tasks on time. 3. The theoretical analysis in this paper is wrong in principle or the conclusion is incorrect. 4. The writing format of the paper is not standardized, the concepts used in the paper are incorrect, the columns are incomplete, and the writing is not neat. 5. The chart in the newspaper. The drawing writing and production in the design are not standardized, and the relevant national standards cannot be implemented. 6. The original data is improperly collected, the calculation conclusion is inaccurate, and the computer cannot be used correctly for research work. 7. When defending a thesis, you can't explain the main content correctly, and you still can't answer all kinds of questions correctly after being inspired by the defense teacher. According to relevant regulations, graduation thesis can generally be divided into four grades: excellent, good, passing and failing. The specific standards of graduation thesis of Correspondence College of Central Party School are copied as follows for reference. Excellent 1. Can correctly reflect the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, and can comprehensively apply the theories learned and the relevant knowledge of this major. 2. Be able to closely contact the actual work of this system, this department and this unit. The analysis of the problem is correct and comprehensive, with certain depth or originality, which has certain guiding significance for practical work. 3. The center is prominent, the arguments are sufficient, the structure is rigorous, the level is clear, and the expression ability is strong. 4. Rich materials and reliable data can be processed and sorted by scientific methods. Ok 1. Can correctly reflect the relevant policies of the party and the state, and can better use the knowledge related to this theory and specialty. 2. Being able to better connect with the actual work and correctly and comprehensively analyze the problems has certain reference function for guiding the actual work. 3. The center is clear, the arguments are sufficient, the levels are clear, the sentences are fluent, and the expression ability is good. 4. The materials are rich, the data are basically reliable, and it can be well processed and sorted. Pass 1. Be able to correctly understand the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, have no principled mistakes in theory, and basically master and apply the relevant knowledge learned in this major. 2. I can also connect with practical work, basically express my views, and have certain ability to analyze and solve problems. However, the analysis of the problem is superficial, or it can only list the phenomena, and the center is not prominent enough. 3. There are certain arguments, the main data are basically reliable, and the sentences are fairly smooth. 4. There are certain original materials, which have been processed and sorted out. Failure to pass any of the following clauses shall be regarded as failure. 1. violates the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, or makes a principled mistake in theory, and has a poor grasp of relevant professional knowledge. 2. The article has no center, unclear levels, chaotic logic and unreasonable sentences. 3. The material is messy or the main data is distorted, and the processing is poor. 4. The main content basically copied the achievements of others.