In the past, the car accelerated 100 kilometers 12s, and I didn't feel slow. Everyone thinks it's good, and the thief is fast. Now 9 seconds later, some people begin to resent it, mainly because more people care about the acceleration time of 100 kilometers.

It's like: the mobile phone charger was left unattended before. Can you charge it? Well, plug it in and it's over, isn't it?

There are more and more fancy styles now. If you only give 20W fast charge, people say it's too slow. Either the conscience manufacturer "hmm", or that's it. Fast charging, flash charging, overcharge ... more and more.

Why didn't anyone feel slow before 12s?

I didn't care about this before.

At a time like 2000, people really didn't care much about the so-called "zero acceleration" data when buying a car.

Shenzhen News Network made a survey, "2006 Shenzhen Automobile Consumption Survey Report". At that time, consumers valued quality first, followed by price, and then fuel consumption. Is it very different from now?

The next step is brand reputation, safety and after-sales service. The most important thing is quality, which is bought as a category.

Don't watch Pepsi or drink well, first ask if Coke is sweet, full of steam, glass bottles or plastic bottles ... At that time, buying a car was such a feeling, and the acceleration of 100 kilometers was completely out of touch.

In other words: at that time, people didn't care whether they bought a car quickly or not, as long as it was durable, the quality was hard enough, the price was affordable and appropriate, and the fuel consumption was acceptable.

The acceleration performance of 12s was good before.

12s' 100 km acceleration performance, at least in compact models, is actually not bad, is it not bad?

There is also a data from car home: the 2005 Buick Excelle has the slowest acceleration per 100 kilometers13.7s; This 2005 Volkswagen Jetta has an acceleration of about13s per 100 kilometers; 2005 BYD F3 100 km acceleration12.3s.

Even some medium-sized cars, the acceleration of 100 kilometers at that time exceeded 12s. The 2007 Volkswagen Magotan has the lowest equipment, with 100 km acceleration14.5s.

There is really no reason to reject the acceleration performance of 12s.

Why are people disgusted with more than 9s now?

Now it's over 9s 100, but some people still think it's not good, mainly for two reasons that we will talk about next.

First of all, the demand for power to buy a car is definitely getting higher and higher. We will never buy computers slower every year, will we? Many friends have also begun to pay attention to the zero-speed acceleration index.

Morphy, Yu Shucong and others published a paper "Research on the Evolution of Demand Preference and Consumer Behavior of Pan-Z Generation Cars" in Automobile Times magazine, which stated that.

Pan-Z generation, the so-called "post-1995", has higher and higher requirements for power. 63% people prefer turbocharging and pay attention to the dynamic response on call.

But motivation itself is an abstract concept, right?

The manufacturer says that the engine has 200 horsepower, but many people have no idea about it and have never ridden a horse. I don't know what horsepower is, do I?

The acceleration time of 100 kilometers better embodies the concept of power.

For example, I said, "Hey, my graphics card is very good, how much memory, how many transistors, what things …" We don't understand either. Is it too complicated?

But you have to say, "Hey, my graphics card supports the highest quality of a game, and it is cheaper and supports medium quality." Whether the resolution is 1080p or 4K, you can understand it immediately, right?

"Perfect picture quality, not stuck at all." "Well, this graphics card is definitely better and more expensive." This is what it does.

Then there is the propaganda of manufacturers, which will also make us have the so-called "survivor prejudice."

Song published a paper "Reflection on Communication Studies under the Theory of Survivor Deviation" in Drama House magazine, which said.

If we don't realize the whole process of selecting research samples and mistakenly think that some selected research samples are representative as a whole, it will easily lead to research bias.

Generally, what you can see on the Internet is excellent 100-kilometer acceleration. If you don't show everyone what you're doing. Isn't it?

Shadow Leopard 6.95s breaks 100, Link 03+ this 5.9s and so on. The news that some electric vehicles with more than 3s and more than 4s have broken 100 is everywhere, which easily gives us an illusion.

"Oh dear!" It's 3 or 4s now, and it's almost there. 9s is not enough to see! That's the feeling.

It seems that I often watch TV plays. One meal is a big table, and many people are surrounded there. 1, 2000 yuan.

After watching too much, we thought that dinner was 1 and 2000,500 yuan to invite me to dinner. Do you despise me? It's only a dozen dollars to order takeout at work every day, okay? Fifty or sixty yuan is very expensive.

That's how it feels. I'll take a takeaway for 50 or 60 yuan and put it online, okay? It's not necessary, is it? Right?

Is it really slow to accelerate 100 kilometers for more than 9 seconds?

The acceleration of 100 kilometers is more than 9 seconds, which is slow now. Let's see who you are compared with.

From the car's point of view, even if it's only 65,438+/kloc-0.00 million yuan, it's not as good as the best batch, at least it's medium level, right?

After all, Toyota Corolla, Nissan Sylphy, 1.5 self-priming Volkswagen LaVida itself tends to be comfortable at home, exceeding 1 1s per 100 kilometers.

But from the owner's point of view, especially for friends who pursue the so-called "wow, push back", 9s is really a bit slow.

We made a video before, "0 to 100KM/H, how many seconds does it take for a car to accelerate?" ",which is mentioned.

The acceleration of 0.5G is more obvious for ordinary people. To achieve an acceleration of 0.5G, the acceleration time of 100 kilometers should be within 6.5s.

The gap between 9s and 6.5s is still relatively large.

A car that accelerates for 9 seconds for 100 kilometers will basically not have the acceleration pleasure of "aha" sucking the backrest as soon as you step on the accelerator. It is understandable that it is too slow.

But I think this is also a preference. Can't say that the mainstream level must be so fast.

The reason why 9s are often rejected now.

So generally speaking, few people said that the acceleration of 100 kilometers was 12s before, mainly because no one cared about this matter, and it was really good in terms of that result at that time.

Now more than 9s are turned away, mainly because more and more people are discussing it, and manufacturers need publicity to do business.

There are good things said there every day on the Internet, and of course, those that are not so good are just put there and don't compare with others.

Well, all we see is that everyone is fine. 3s, 4s, 5s and 6s may all be abandoned, not to mention 9s, which may be an illusion.

Of course, there are electric cars, right? There is an electric car purring. It's really a thief, isn't it?