Current location - Education and Training Encyclopedia - Graduation thesis - On the Debate of Courage

Question 1: One should have the confidence to act. (or men need confidence. )

Question 1: There is no (1) article that first says "being a man needs self-confidenc

On the Debate of Courage

Question 1: One should have the confidence to act. (or men need confidence. )

Question 1: There is no (1) article that first says "being a man needs self-confidenc

On the Debate of Courage

Question 1: One should have the confidence to act. (or men need confidence. )

Question 1: There is no (1) article that first says "being a man needs self-confidence" and then talks about "doing things needs self-confidence"; Only when you have confidence can you have courage, and only when you do things can you be resolute. There is a hierarchical relationship between the two and they cannot be interchanged. (2 points per point, 4 points in total)

Question 1:(4 points) A uses the method of comparative argument to strongly demonstrate the supporting role of profound theoretical literacy, rich knowledge connotation and mature thinking ability on a person's self-confidence from both positive and negative aspects. In B, the metaphor method is used, and the role of learning is vividly illustrated by the metaphor of "standing on a high mountain", thus demonstrating that the bottom spirit comes from superb skills and is easy to understand. (Demonstration method 2 points, function 2 points, 4 points)

Small problem 1:(3 points) Example: If you lack self-confidence, you will be timid and indecisive, making people untrustworthy and uneasy, and you will get lost in weakness, difficulty, vulgarity and sinking. Mainly short sentences, using compound sentence, concise and fast, with strong sense of rhythm and full of momentum. (sentence 1, analysis 2)

1 question: this question examines the ability to summarize the central arguments of argumentative essays. The central argument of an argumentative paper can be considered from the title, beginning and end.

1 Question: This question examines the logical thinking ability of understanding argumentative writing. According to the rigor of the argument, it can be analyzed.

1 Question: This question examines the argumentation method and expression effect of argumentative essays. The general method to solve this problem is: method+viewpoint, combined with specific sentence analysis.

Question 1: This question is an open question. Let's talk about the characteristics of argumentative language.