The direction delineated by this topic is really difficult to write. This argument is extremely vague. It seems that you can only make a subtitle at most (indicating that you focus on Faulkner's Bear as the main means of your thesis).

Because the word "humanistic feelings" is an interpretation that defines the author's observation of some basic worldviews, it can no longer refer to the specific content that expresses Faulkner's true feelings. Since you can't, if this title is the main title, it is an empty performance of dereliction of duty.

So your question: "What is the general definition of a writer's humanistic feelings" is also a false question-the expression "humanistic feelings" does not need to be defined at all. What we really need to know is: "What is Faulkner's feeling?"

Let's watch Bear again. This feeling may also be put forward by some insightful arguments. When it comes to feelings, novelist Faulkner and poet Ye Zhi should be equal in "modernist feelings". The statement of "modernist feelings" is just like your statement of "humanistic feelings", but it is just an empty shelf. Only after comparative reading can you convey your specific feelings about their unique world views with excellent and specific rhetoric, can you say some two different "feelings". The word "feelings" at this time is substantial and meaningful. )

Or Shen Congwen. His love for scenery and countryside can also be compared with Faulkner's. Based on these thoughts, after careful consideration and proposition, it is suitable to write an article with substance in speech.