Administrative efficiency refers to the proportional relationship between the resources invested by public organizations and administrative personnel in public management and the achievements and benefits obtained. Various resources refer to manpower, financial resources, material resources and time as well as various tangible and intangible resources. Performance refers to management performance, including tangible material performance and intangible spiritual performance. Benefits include economic benefits and social benefits, mainly social benefits. Administrative efficiency is government efficiency, and government efficiency is government productivity, which is a comprehensive productivity to promote social development. Administrative efficiency can be divided into three levels: organizational efficiency (efficiency shown by top decision makers), management efficiency (efficiency shown by middle managers) and work efficiency (efficiency shown by grass-roots staff). These three levels of efficiency are mutually influential and complementary, and cannot exist independently.
Improve administrative efficiency and serve the window.
Administrative efficiency can be understood from many aspects: first, it refers to the quantitative proportional relationship between input and output; The second is the best choice; The third refers to the highest record that can be achieved; Fourth, it refers to the degree of completion of the established goals; Fifth, it refers to overcoming difficulties and solving problems in a timely and effective manner. The above aspects all evaluate administrative efficiency from a macro perspective, but in concrete practice, it should be comprehensively measured and evaluated in combination with reality. We often use the following three methods to evaluate, measure and calculate administrative efficiency (from unit cost, per capita burden, fencing? Cost to measure); Administrative function measurement method (comparing each goal with the ideal goal and the standard that must be achieved); Factor scoring method (scoring manpower, funds, materials, institutions, systems and methods). We can also examine administrative efficiency from another angle: local and overall (insisting that local efficiency is subordinate to overall efficiency); Short term and long term; Economic benefits and social benefits (pure economic benefits should belong to social benefits); Positive and negative benefits (comprehensive measurement).