However, vaccination is a personal matter after all. The state advocates voluntary vaccination and has issued some documents or policies that cannot be popularized by vaccination. However, we still see some "local regulations" that violate voluntary vaccination: for example, people who are not vaccinated are prohibited from entering public places; It is forbidden to take public transport; Others should be included in the personal integrity record; Then, students and their parents are forced to vaccinate; Some are also linked to wages and bonuses; What's more, those who are infected without vaccination should be seriously investigated for responsibility.
Every time I see these regulations, I always think of the birth policy introduced in the last century. There may not be us at that time, but I heard the situation at that time: some pregnant women were arrested for seven or eight miscarriages, and women had to be put on the ring after giving birth. It's terrible to think about it. Living in that era was really painful. I hope I won't be "unreasonable" and do whatever I want as before. Policies should be understood, not distorted.
I have a lot of complaints about the practice of giving cash or material rewards to vaccinated people in various parts of the country in order to improve the vaccination rate!
Improving the national vaccination rate is a good intention and conducive to national epidemic prevention, but the measures taken are debatable. Today, in order to improve the vaccination rate, all kinds of encouragement are given, even the higher the price, which will form a very bad atmosphere. There will be similar situations in the future, and I think there will be more people watching. The first person to get vaccinated not only risks the side effects of vaccination, but also is the first person to eat crabs, and there are no rewards. Those who were vaccinated later were not suitable for themselves. In addition to the reasons for vaccination at the beginning, they are all people who are not active in the prevention and control of the epidemic.
Therefore, it is now a phenomenon that bad money drives out good money, which will form a very bad atmosphere, which is not conducive to future governance and grassroots work, as well as epidemic prevention and control. In my opinion, it is better to change the practice, such as publicly giving the first batch of people who take the initiative to vaccinate at home, whether it is material reward or honorary reward, and with the progress of the vaccination process at home, the earlier you play, the more rewards you get, and the later you play, the smaller the reward. It is possible that the effect is not obvious now, but if there is a similar situation in the future, the policy will be promoted more smoothly. This is gradual, and the predecessors planted trees and the descendants enjoyed the cool.