basic concept

Detailed rules for the implementation of blind inspection of doctoral and master's dissertations in Jiangnan University

Edit the basic concepts of this paragraph.

A system of organizing expert group review: anonymous submission, that is, the reviewer does not know who the author of the paper is. The blind evaluation system is to send dissertations without the author's name to experts who can't know the author for evaluation, so the score should be the most objective. General colleges and universities, especially graduate schools, have relevant regulations on blind examination of papers on a regular basis, and most of them randomly select a certain number of papers for blind examination. External auditing refers to sending papers to experts from other units for auditing. Some schools are managed by the degree office in a unified way, while others are guided by tutors. 90% of the experts appointed by the tutor submit papers for review, and they can only pass because of the good relationship between the experts and the tutor. The right of reply can only be obtained after the blind trial and the external trial are passed, and you can't graduate if you fail to reply. As long as two experts pass the blind trial or two experts pass the external trial, they have the right of reply. The defense Committee does not include experts from external auditors, and only half of them can graduate. Some doctors and masters can't graduate, but the proportion of masters is very small, and some have graduated, but the proportion is less than 1%. All doctoral dissertations and some master's dissertations are sent to other units for blind evaluation by the degree office before the defense, so as to ensure the quality of the defense thesis. In addition, the provincial and municipal education committees will randomly select a certain proportion of papers and invite other units to do blind evaluation to check the quality of postgraduate training. All doctoral and master's dissertations can only participate in the defense if they pass the blind evaluation and external review, and then the defense Committee decides whether to pass the defense and award the degree. Finally, the academic degree committee of the unit will decide whether to grant the degree by secret ballot according to the quality of the thesis, course performance, ideological expression and whether to publish the thesis. If it is approved, it will be publicized for 3 months before obtaining the degree certificate. Those who do not graduate with a doctorate or master's degree generally have no academic qualifications and degrees. Some graduates have academic qualifications and no degree, while others have academic qualifications and degrees. The proportion of blind examination of master's thesis in different schools is different, generally between 30% and 50%. Doctoral dissertations are all blind, and of course there are those who can't graduate. Especially good schools pay more attention to the quality of postgraduate training. Shanghai draws a certain proportion of applied graduate students to participate in the blind trial. Doctoral students are subject to compulsory blind trial. As long as they apply for a doctoral degree, they must participate in blind trial. Blind evaluation means that the content and topic of the paper can't involve your tutor's name and your name. Generally, it is sent to foreign schools for review, and the reviewers will not know who this paper belongs to and who is the instructor of this paper. So it's called blind trial. Blind tests, especially doctors, must be taken seriously, but then again, taking them seriously will basically pass (master's thesis). The doctoral thesis itself requires high academic level, so it is difficult to pass.

This paragraph edits the detailed rules for the implementation of blind evaluation of doctoral and master's dissertations of Jiangnan University.

I. The principle of blind trial (1) Follow the relevant principles and provisions of the Regulations on Academic Degrees in People's Republic of China (PRC); (two) is conducive to objectively reflect the real situation of the quality of graduate education in each degree point; (three) to strengthen the construction of degree programs, establish and improve the quality assurance and supervision mechanism of postgraduate education; (four) focused, simple. Second, the object of blind examination of papers The object of blind examination of papers is the full-time graduate students who were preparing to defend their papers in our school that year. Third, the blind test method 1. Postgraduates who participated in the double-blind review: doctoral students 100%, three copies each. Master students (including those applying for equivalent academic degrees) shall be submitted in duplicate for preliminary examination according to 3 ~ 5% of the number of respondents who applied for dissertation in that year. 2. According to the distribution of disciplines and professional graduate students who apply for dissertation defense every year, graduate department formulates a blind test plan and submits it to the principal in charge for approval. 3. According to the blind trial plan, graduate department draws up the list of graduate students who need to be blind-audited, and after checking with the list of graduate students who apply for thesis defense, informs me and the college to which the subject belongs to be blind-audited. 4. Graduate students who have been drawn out to participate in the blind test should make a paper in the prescribed format (the name of the author and tutor is hidden) within two days after receiving the notice, with master's thesis in duplicate and doctoral thesis in triplicate, and submit it to the Graduate Office. Four. Blind review requirements (1) All the blind reviewers of the papers shall be borne by peer experts outside the school, and graduate department shall be responsible for selecting from the expert database. (2) In order to ensure the normal work of blind inspection of dissertations, all master students who apply for dissertation defense must submit their dissertations 30 days in advance, and doctoral students 45 days in advance (except in winter and summer vacations). (three) to participate in the blind examination of papers, it is necessary to organize the defense work after the results of the blind examination are determined, and the results of the blind examination should be used as the basis for the qualification of defense and the evaluation of papers. (four) review papers are generally not returned. Four. The opinions on the handling of blind trial results (1) have all been withdrawn, and the review opinions are valid. If it cannot be completely withdrawn, the missing copy must be submitted for review. (II) Due to special circumstances, if it is not possible to withdraw all the papers submitted in time, graduate department can decide whether to let the graduate students defend their papers first according to the withdrawn evaluation opinions, and then determine the handling opinions of the defense according to the number of empty albums recovered and the evaluation opinions. (3) If one vote is rejected in the double-blind evaluation of doctoral dissertations, two reviewers will be added for a second interview; If negative opinions appear again, the paper will be judged as unqualified. If two votes are rejected, the paper will be judged unqualified. The master's degree thesis is subject to blind examination and one-vote veto system. (4) graduate department informed the degree evaluation sub-committee, tutors and graduate students to defend their papers. If the thesis is considered unqualified, the graduate department will inform the graduate students and their tutors to revise the thesis; If the graduate students themselves and their tutors disagree with the results of the blind test, they can fill in the Application Form for Review and apply for a review. (5) After receiving the Application Form for Review, the Sub-committee on Responsibility Assessment shall organize relevant experts or members of the Sub-committee to comment on the dissertations and blind evaluation opinions that have been blindly rated as unqualified. If you agree with the results of blind evaluation, you should instruct the instructor to guide the graduate students to carefully revise their dissertations within the prescribed time limit. The blind trial fee shall be borne by the tutor or graduate student. (6) The revision period for the dissertations that fail the blind evaluation shall not exceed two years for doctors and one year for masters. The revised dissertation still needs to participate in double-blind review, and in principle, it will be re-reviewed by the original reviewer. If the paper is rejected again, the author's degree application qualification will be cancelled. (7) Where the graduate dissertations brought by tutors are blindly rated as unqualified dissertations, they must participate in the next round of double-blind evaluation or appraisal at their own expense, and at the same time increase the proportion of double-blind evaluation in their disciplines. (8) Graduate tutors who fail to pass the blind examination of their papers twice (in different sessions) are restricted from enrolling students within two years. If two people in a session are blindly examined as unqualified papers, their tutor qualifications will be cancelled. (9) If two graduate students in two disciplines are blindly judged as unqualified dissertations, the discipline shall give a warning, rectify and reduce the enrollment plan. V. Measures for reviewing classified papers (1) Confirmation of classified papers 1. Dissertations related to classified scientific research projects confirmed by the science and technology industry department of the school; 2. Although the work of the thesis does not involve confidential scientific research projects, some contents are not suitable for public disclosure: it is applied by the tutor, agreed by the person in charge of the degree sub-committee, and approved by the chairman of the university degree committee. (a) the review of classified papers is confirmed as classified papers without blind review, but it needs public review. According to the confidentiality of the paper, experts inside and outside the school can be invited for public review. Six, the rules from the fall of 2006 graduate students began to implement, by graduate department is responsible for the interpretation of.

Audit of external/external professionals

abstract

In short, external review. Third-party audit, also known as external audit, when enterprises and institutions apply for quality management system audit and certification, is an evaluation behavior of organizations applying for certification by national certification bodies or nationally recognized certification bodies in accordance with relevant laws and certification procedures. External evaluation of papers, also known as external evaluation, is an act that educational institutions submit students' papers to experts who are not from their own institutions for evaluation to ensure the fairness of evaluation.

Edit the paragraph of external auditor.

concept

As a third-party certification body, external auditors audit the management system of enterprises applying for certification. ? External auditor is the general name of national registered auditor. This is a qualified auditor, trained and registered by CNAT, who has worked in a certification body for 20 days, and must pass the interview of CNAT to maintain his qualification. Moreover, he tries to maintain his qualification every year. The external auditor is the person who audits the enterprises that are prepared or have passed the certification, and he has the right to report to the certification company whether the enterprises are implemented according to the requirements of ISO900 1. Of course, it is respected by enterprises, and it is also a high-paying industry. Auditors are paid by the day.

Apply for qualification

First, take the ISO9000 external auditor training course, and then pass the exam (passing 70 points) to obtain the training certificate. If you want to register an auditor, you have to declare, and you have certain academic qualifications and related work requirements.

Matters needing attention

1. Please arrange a car to pick up the auditor. You should communicate with the auditor three days in advance about the route and time to pick up the auditor, and it is best for the management representative to pick it up in person. Please prepare a meeting room for auditors to hold meetings and write work reports. Please put a bunch of flowers and fruits on the table. 3. Please arrange two people who are familiar with the company's operation to accompany the auditor all the time; 4. When the auditor finds the problem, please inform the consultant in time; Everyone must know what the company's quality policy is. What is the company's quality goal? 6. Don't be nervous when auditors ask their own questions, treat them with a normal heart, and make it clear when answering questions. If auditors ask questions that are not within their scope of work, they should politely tell them that they are not responsible, and then the accompanying staff will explain them to the auditors, or find someone who can answer the questions to avoid "talking too much will lose you". 7. When looking for information, the auditor gives him whatever he wants. Don't give him the whole document at once. This will make auditors find many problems. The correct way should be to take whatever he wants and then give it to the company's entourage first. When the accompanying personnel find the problem, they should ask for another copy for the auditor. 8. The general manager should say: 1. The quality policy was formulated by himself, with purpose 2. Require all departments to set quality objectives and evaluate them regularly; 3. Designated management representative; 4. Determine the organization chart of the company, clarify the responsibilities of all personnel, and coordinate the relationship between them; 5. Provide necessary human and material resources for the smooth operation of the quality management system; 6. Communicate to the company the necessity of meeting the requirements of customers and laws and regulations; 7. Preside over the management review meeting. 9. The management representative answered and conducted two internal audits. Monthly statistics of quality objectives, customer satisfaction survey, and corrective measures for non-compliance and customer complaints; 10. Every manager should be clear about his responsibilities, especially his role in improving quality and increasing customer satisfaction. See the questions to be answered and mastered by each department for details; 1 1. Employees should be aware of the steps they are taking, and what they say should not contradict what is written in relevant documents. It is suggested that the heads of all departments should let employees read their relevant documents at least three times in these two days; 12. If you can't find the information at this time, you should draw the attention of the auditors to other prepared aspects. On the other hand, you should actively look for relevant information and give it to the auditor before the auditor ends the audit that day. 13. All staff should participate in a general cleaning, and all departments should do a good job in sorting out, rectifying and cleaning their respective areas of responsibility; 14. All personnel should be familiar with documents related to themselves, so as not to be arrogant when answering auditors' questions; 15. Please put a welcome card at the gate of the company, which reads "Warmly welcome-company experts come to our company to guide our work"; Ask the management representative to hold a meeting to convey it to relevant personnel.