Successful people often attribute their success to themselves, while unsuccessful people often say that failure is providence. The former is easy to agree that heroes talk about heroes by success or failure, while the latter will not excuse themselves by success or failure. This is the natural expression of human nature. Both sides hold their own words, the loser is discouraged and the winner is arrogant. Both of them are actually due to the lack of their own rationality: one is to ignore the role of synchronization, and the other is to exaggerate the synchronization of the process.
Kunpeng still has to spread his wings in the wind. Without an environment suitable for development, how can we succeed? We are not a god who can call the wind and rain, and any success does not depend entirely on ourselves. We can rely on rationality to predict the environment, but this prediction is never absolute. First, the environment cannot be absolutely grasped on the ground. Second, our reason will never be perfect. Therefore, the rational strong need a coincidence to succeed. If they are unlucky or unlucky, success or failure is not entirely up to them. Therefore, failure cannot be shirked, and success cannot be attributed to oneself.
Success or failure is not a simple act of God, and the result of behavior contains unpredictable synchronicity, which also permeates the initiative of life, so no one has his own absoluteness, and the initiative of life must be restricted by synchronicity, so as to achieve a balance between the two, and the synchronization of reconstruction constitutes the premise of things. After synchronization, it enters an inevitable process, which we can't change. Only by understanding and using it can we realize the post-synchronous transformation, which is itself the active rational state of life. Understanding and using inevitability to transform synchronization is the full value and significance of life initiative, which includes people's active consciousness and behavior. Obviously, the former is a rational form, and the latter is a state of rational realization. The state of process and result is relative, and the synchronization and initiative of life can be sustained. Obviously, only reason is the root of the active state of life, so it constitutes the essence of a hero.
In this way, we find the role of rationality, so we can objectively draw the conclusion that the success or failure of human behavior results depends on one's own rational state, and the other is the synchronization that the environment cannot absolutely grasp. None of them have their own absolutes. The combination of the two can achieve the success or failure of behavior results, but their functions are not equal. Reason has a greater role, because it is a positive state of life, but it does not have its own absolute. Therefore, success or failure not only belongs to ourselves, but also has a more important relationship with our own rationality. Human reason is never perfect, but it is an eternal development process. Therefore, the success or failure of behavior results will increasingly depend on its own reasons. Although synchronization cannot be absolutely grasped, rationality can be transformed as much as possible, including the choice of environment at the beginning of career, which is essentially such a process. It can be seen that synchronization restricts rationality and only has extremely absolute significance.
Heroes are not judged by success or failure, and success or failure is already the realistic state of behavior results. If the unpredictable synchronization in the process is excluded, there will be the inevitability of cause and effect, which is a category that can be understood and utilized rationally. No matter how much success or failure is due to its own rationality, it is of course a state of rational realization. There are reasons for success and reasons for failure. Such winners are generally heroes, while losers are at least not heroes. Can such a conclusion be established? Through the previous analysis, we can be sure that the title of hero is well-deserved as long as we rely on our own reason to succeed. If we are lucky and become heroes, then heroes have to give some discounts.
It seems that the connotation of heroes needs to be analyzed, so we divide heroes into two types: rational heroes and realistic heroes. Through this division, we find that this problem has been solved. From the analysis of the concept of rational hero, it is obvious that the success or failure of reality should not be taken as the standard, while the realistic hero is intuitively the opposite. In this way, we can draw the conclusion that rational heroes don't judge heroes by success or failure, while realistic heroes only judge heroes by success or failure. Once divided, two seemingly opposite conclusions actually have their own scope of establishment. But after such analysis, can we reach a unified conclusion? If there is only analysis and no summary, then we have not answered this question.
Analysis is the premise of summary, but not the result, otherwise we will become resourceful Yuan Benchu. Analysis is to find out the different characteristics of things, so summary needs to find out the relationship between things. So, our question now is: Is there any connection between rational heroes and realistic heroes? The answer is obviously yes. The success or failure of the result of human behavior depends on the dual functions of life initiative and inevitable synchronization of rational infiltration. Reason, as one of the elements, has affected success or failure, so there is a realistic correlation between them. Generally, the rational strong are more likely to succeed, so the rational hero will generally become a realistic hero, but this conclusion cannot be absolute. In this way, we can infer that under normal circumstances, a hero can be judged by success or failure. This hero is already a unified concept. Its fundamental meaning is a rational hero, but it contains realistic heroes in the conceptual state, which constitutes the unity of concepts.
Another condition that determines success or failure does not constitute a denial of this conclusion, but only a logical OR. Therefore, the negation of this conclusion is only an absolute and extreme negation, which has no universal significance, and because human reason is not perfect, it can realize itself. Unable to grasp synchronization, we can't grasp synchronization in an absolute sense, so it no longer belongs to the essence of our hero. Rationality is the fundamental reason whether a hero is a hero or not, so it will only lead to the absolute negation of "judging heroes by success or failure" With the development of human rationality, rationality plays a more and more important role in determining success or failure, while the role of synchronization is relatively smaller and smaller. Therefore, the conclusion of "heroes are judged by success or failure" in the general sense is absolutely relative.
However, the reality is still the general stage of rational development. The universal rationality of human beings is far from reaching the limit, and the rational state of human beings is also very different. Unpredictable synchronization is still very important. "Don't judge heroes by success or failure", so it has certain realistic rationality. However, only when unpredictable synchronization has a great influence on success or failure, and the actual success or failure is seriously misplaced with the rational state, can we say that "a hero cannot be judged by success or failure!" This is relative absoluteness. We can't say that winners are not heroes, but losers are heroes. That's a joke.
Through the above analysis, we definitely want to "judge heroes by success or failure", but we can't absolutely draw its conclusion. This is the general method of analyzing things by chaos philosophy and the general conclusion of the dual law of chaos philosophy. So how do we apply this conclusion realistically? Here we should emphasize the rational symbol of chaotic philosophy: failure due to lack of rationality is certainly not a hero, and failure due to unpredictable synchronization cannot be said that he is not a hero. In fact, hero is a relative concept. His failure to become a hero in reality has shown his irrationality. However, this state has different levels in reality. It can't be said that a lucky person is a hero compared with an unfortunate person, because they are likely to have a dislocation between rational state and realistic success or failure. Only in this sense can we not judge heroes by success or failure.
Reason is never perfect, so success is not an absolute hero. Of course, arrogance is not qualified. Unfortunately, you can't say that you are not a hero, and naturally there is no need to be discouraged. This is the basic conclusion based on the heroic nature under realistic rationality. Winners have their own reasons for success and losers have their own reasons for failure, but winners should not be arrogant and losers should not be discouraged, because arrogance and discouragement themselves mark the lack of their own rationality. Depression is cowardice that denies the initiative of life. Of course, it lacks rationality. Arrogance is also different from the publicity of life. It is also a manifestation of lack of rationality. Regardless of arrogance or discouragement, the irrational state will inevitably lead to future failure.
Ordinary people are arrogant because of success and discouraged because of failure, which is a common manifestation of general lack of rationality. In fact, this is a higher level of rationality. Being arrogant because of success can only explain the luck of its successful process and its own irrationality. Because arrogance seems to be self-confident, in fact, it is to cover up the lack of rationality and unable to face up to one's inferiority complex. The result of arrogance can only be a disastrous failure in the future. Being discouraged by failure is a serious lack of rationality, which not only shows the lack of rationality in reality, but also fundamentally denies the initiative of life; Although failure is not discouraged, although success is not arrogant, it is a face-up to one's own rationality, so the winner will continue to be more successful and failure will become the mother of success. Such a person will open the door to career success one day, no matter what happens now.
In fact, success or failure is only a relative concept. People's living conditions have two basic indicators, one is the social level, and the other is the specific environment. We can't use either one to explain success or failure alone, but the combination of the two is often the opposite result, so no one is absolutely successful and no one is absolutely failed. In this world, no one is a hero, and no one is not a hero. There is only one state of active realization of life, extreme arrogance and extreme timidity to forcibly paddle. At that time, I couldn't tell who was a hero and who was a dog.