After graduating from Ph.D. in June, 2006, He Haibo studied in the postdoctoral mobile station of pharmacy of Zhejiang University, and the co-tutor was Academician Li. Li is the dean of the School of Pharmacy appointed by the school.
In the whole process of "He Haibo's Thesis Incident", the school * * * examined 20 papers of He Hai and related personnel suspected of academic ethics in its research room, including 9 papers involving He Haibo. Except for 1 paper as co-author, He Haibo's eight papers as the first author all have serious academic misconduct in varying degrees, such as plagiarism, copying the experimental data of the original doctoral supervisor, two manuscripts, some charts and figures, repeated publication, unauthorized signature of others' names, unauthorized marking of fund support, fabricating well-known experts to help improve English, etc. In view of the conclusive problem, I confessed, and the school immediately punished him: in June last year 165438+ 10, it was decided to revoke his post and qualification as an associate professor and terminate his employment contract. Because of the extremely serious consequences at home and abroad, the school decided to expel him from the faculty.
The correspondent of eight papers with academic falsification in He Haibo is Associate Professor Wu XX, Director of Pharmacology Research Office of Traditional Chinese Medicine in our school. According to the investigation of nearly four months, there is no evidence that Wu directly participated in the writing and preliminary submission of the above papers; However, after some of He Haibo's problem papers were hired or published, he took the unshirkable responsibility as a correspondent to apply for the project. I also have problems such as repeated publication of academic papers; In addition, the supervision of the study style in the laboratory of traditional Chinese medicine is out of order, and as the director of the laboratory, he is seriously negligent in management. Recently, on the basis of finding out the facts, we made a decision: to cancel the positions of Assistant Director of the Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Director of the Pharmacology Research Office of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Comrade Wu, give him a heavier punishment, and terminate the employment contract.
According to the statements of all relevant personnel, handwriting identification and other materials currently available, why did Academician Li's signature in eight papers involving academic fraud in He Haibo be signed without Haibo's knowledge? There is no evidence to prove that Li participated in the fraud, plagiarism and plagiarism of the papers. As the dean, academic leader and cooperative tutor, Academician Li is responsible for the neglect of management, poor education and lax supervision of the He Haibo incident. The current dean's term expires and the school will not renew his appointment.
2. For Tamia Liu and Zhong Hua, lecturers of Jinggangshan University, the end of 2009 will be a difficult year. Their impressive record of publishing 70 papers in 2007-2008 has turned into an unmanageable farce.
A few days ago, the international academic journal Journal of Crystals recently published an editorial notice signed by three people, arguing that 70 papers by Tamia Liu and Zhong Hua were suspected of falsifying data, and clearly pointed out that these studies were "academic deception" that "operations could not be generated from these data". This news caused a heated discussion in China, especially for Zhang Taicheng, president of Jinggangshan University.
Zhang Taicheng: This is unprecedented and we are very shocked. One of them was studying outside, so we called him back and suspended the investigation. Once verified, we will deal with it seriously. This is their personal behavior. The school hates this kind of academic fraud and tampering with data. Jinggangshan spirit is seeking truth from facts.
In addition to the alleged falsification of the paper data, the identities of the two authors have also changed from lecturers to professors and doctors, and many netizens are very indignant at this double deception. The reporter interviewed Wan Jikang, Party Secretary of Jinggangshan University. In Wan Jikang's introduction, the third scam surfaced again.
Wan Jikang: Tamia Liu is an engineering major. In terms of professional development, it is impossible for him to study this field, but he has just published so many articles (27 articles) in this field. He was also inspired by Zhong Hua, who told him the secret in private, and then he planned to post an article on it.
Fame and fortune should be the key.
What attracted two lecturers to make mistakes frequently in order to publish their papers? Many comments point to the evaluation of professional titles. The reporter found in the investigation that the drive of fame and fortune is the key.
Zhang Taicheng, President of Jinggangshan University: It should have nothing to do with their two titles. If the 2007 article should have been written in early 2007 or 2006, they are all lecturers, and they are still lecturers.
Wan Jikang: I don't know if they faked it to evaluate their professional titles. If it is to evaluate professional titles, he won't want so many papers, and he won't want dozens of papers in a publication in a short time. This is already a little crazy. He is no longer the guiding function of professional title evaluation. The number of articles published in core journals and collected by the three retrieval systems is very low, not dozens, which should be driven by personal name and profit.
Wan Jikang also expressed his condolences to Tamia Liu and Zhong Hua.
Wan Jikang: We are also saddened by the situation of these two teachers. They are in their thirties, which is a good trend. This serious violation of academic ethics will definitely have a great negative impact on their future development. This is a "high voltage line".
Zhang Taicheng, president of Jinggangshan University, said that the paper was suspected to have been forged 1 year ago, which also aroused the suspicion of the school. However, Tamia Liu and Zhong Hua's hasty explanation led to the neglect of relevant functional departments.
Zhang Taicheng: The relevant functional departments of the school know their papers, because we will do statistics. At first, I suspected that he was faking, and I wondered how he published so much. Later, they said that this kind of crystal was easier and found that the structure of a molecule was a little different.
The editorial department of the Journal of Crystallography said that the investigation is still going on, and all the manuscripts submitted by Jinggangshan University to the relevant volumes of the Journal of Crystallography have been marked and checked for authenticity, and the number of problematic papers may continue to climb. Many people commented that "Jinggangshan University" was blacklisted, which means that any papers that may come from this school in the future will have to undergo strict examination before they can be published in international academic journals. Wan Jikang, secretary of the Party Committee of Jinggangshan University, said frankly that the negative effects need to be faced one by one.
Wan Jikang: The negative impact is very extensive, that's for sure. It will have an impact on the image of Beijing University and the teachers of Jinggangshan University. If Crystal magazine takes some sanctions, it is also reasonable, and the criticism of netizens is also reasonable.
3. Huang Zongying, male, 1993 Ph.D. candidate in American literature in Peking University,1996 stayed in the school as a teacher in July, and1997 was promoted to associate professor in August. Before the incident, he was the chairman of the trade union.
The investigation of Huang started on June 5438+10.2 this year, and a netizen published "Complete Plagiarism-Comment on Eliot-The Immortal Soul of Poetry" by Mr. Huang Zongying, an associate professor of English Department in Peking University.
The netizen named "Zhong Nanhu" listed the details of Ai's plagiarism in more than 7,000 words, and thought that Huang's Ai basically copied the biography of Eliot directly from the British writer.
Since then, Peking University Foreign Studies University has set up an academic team to investigate. /kloc-In February, 2008, Huang Zongying submitted a self-examination report, and thought that the words "directly copying the Chinese version of Eliot's biography" only accounted for 25.6% of the total words, and other methods were adopted, such as quoting, rewriting and translating, which was not considered as direct plagiarism. Huang denied the problems in other manuscripts and papers.
However, according to the evaluation report of Huang Zongying's academic plagiarism by the verification team of the English Department of Peking University and the definition of plagiarism in the Writing Guide for Research Papers of the American Linguistic Society, Huang Zongying's plagiarism against Ai accounts for 74% of the whole book.
At the same time, Huang Zongying's paper "A Man is a City": Patterson read by Williams at an international conference is basically a plagiarized work by splicing the original poems of three American scholars.
According to Peking University English Department's qualitative opinion and intention to deal with Huang Zongying's academic violation, starting from this year 1, the academic team of Peking University English Department reviewed Huang Zongying's academic achievements from 2009 to 2003: Eliot-The Immortal Soul of Poetry (Changchun Press 1999) and The History of Lyrics (Peking University Press, 2009).
Huang Zongying, an associate professor of English Department in Peking University, was recently dismissed from the hospital for academic plagiarism. The details of Huang's plagiarism and the handling opinions of Peking University Foreign Languages Institute have been published on the academic review website.
4. Huang Qing, male, professor, doctoral supervisor, one of the first academic and technical leaders in Sichuan Province, has served as vice president of Southwest Jiaotong University, dean of graduate school and vice president of Southwest Jiaotong University.
Seven professors, including Jia Jianmin, Dean of School of Economics and Management of Southwest Jiaotong University, reported plagiarism of Huang Qing's doctoral thesis nine years ago. The Academic Committee of Southwest Jiaotong University made the conclusion that "the plagiarism in the fourth chapter of Huang Qing's doctoral thesis is established and serious in nature". Subsequently, Southwest Jiaotong University dealt with Huang Qing's plagiarism, canceled his doctorate and revoked his postgraduate tutor qualification.
Recently, the reporter saw from official website of Southwest Jiaotong University that Huang Qing, the former vice president of the school, was not in the current leadership list of the school.
5. Students report their tutors: The earliest case in China was 20 1 1 year, when Peng Zhen, a postdoctoral fellow at Shandong University, reported his master tutor Li Hua, a professor at the School of Physics of Shandong University, for academic misconduct. Related to this, Peng Zhen sued his colleague to the court and finally went to the Supreme People's Court. This incident was reported by Jinan Times, Qilu Evening News, Shandong TV Qilu Channel and Gong X Channel, and was reprinted by Science Network and Sina.com, which caused widespread concern at that time.
At the beginning of 20 14, Wang Yucheng of Fudan University reported that his tutor, Academician Wang Zhengmin, became a hot topic of public opinion. This is the second case in which a student reported his tutor.