Excellent:
The topic of this paper conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is heavy.
The topic selection has high academic research (reference) value (great practical guiding significance).
This student has a strong ability to consult documents and materials, can comprehensively collect information about the examination system, can comprehensively use the knowledge of the examination system in the writing process, can comprehensively analyze the graduation thesis of the examination system, and has a strong ability to comprehensively use knowledge.
The length of the article fully conforms to the requirements of the college, with complete content, scientific hierarchical structure, prominent points, clear logical relationship and certain personal opinions.
The topics are completely consistent, the arguments are prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme.
The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification;
Rich references and strong timeliness;
There is no plagiarism.
Good:
The topic selection of the thesis conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal, which is difficult and has a large workload.
The topic selection has academic research (reference) value (practical guiding significance).
The student has a strong ability to consult documents and materials, and can comprehensively collect information about the examination system. He can comprehensively apply the knowledge of the examination system, comprehensively analyze the problems existing in the examination system, and has a strong ability to comprehensively apply knowledge.
The length of the article fully meets the requirements of the college, the content is relatively complete, the hierarchical structure is scientific, the main points are prominent, and the logical relationship is clear, but it lacks personal opinions.
The topic is consistent, the argument is prominent, and the discussion is closely related to the theme.
The language expression is fluent, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification;
Rich references and strong timeliness;
No plagiarism was found.
Medium:
The topic of this paper conforms to the professional training goal and can achieve the comprehensive training goal. The topic is difficult and the workload is average.
The topic selection has academic research (reference) value (practical guiding significance).
The student's ability to consult documents is average, and he can collect information about the examination system. In the process of writing, he can basically use the knowledge of the examination system and comprehensively analyze the problems of the examination system, and his ability to comprehensively use knowledge is average.
The length of the article fully meets the requirements of the college, the content is basically complete, the hierarchical structure is general, and the main points are focused on certain logic, but there is a lack of personal opinions.
The topics are basically the same, and the arguments are more prominent. Discussion can better serve the argument.
The language expression is general, and the format fully meets the requirements of the specification;
Referring to some documents, its timeliness is general;
No obvious plagiarism was found.
By:
The topic of this paper conforms to the professional training goal, and can basically achieve the comprehensive training goal, with less difficulty and less workload.
The theme of the paper is general.
Students' ability to consult documents is poor, and they can't collect information about the examination system comprehensively. In the process of writing, his ability to comprehensively apply the knowledge of examination system and comprehensively analyze the problems of examination system is poor.
The length of the article meets the requirements of the college, the content is not complete enough, the hierarchical structure is problematic, the main points are not prominent enough, the logic is poor, and there is no personal opinion.
The title of the article is biased, the argument is not prominent enough, and the discussion can't stick to the theme.
The language expression is poor and the format meets the requirements of the specification;
Less possession data and poor timeliness;
Some contents are similar to others' achievements.