Comments: This paper studies the distortion of accounting information, which has strong practical value and provides a new basis for controlling the distortion of accounting information.
The author has clear thinking, rigorous discussion process, reasonable analysis and practical results.
The writing of the thesis is standardized and the sentences are fluent, which meets the requirements of academic proofreading of dissertations.
Comments: The title of the paper is basically the same as the content of the paper, with complete structure and fluent language.
Even the first draft, except that the paragraphs are too thin, there are not many serious grammar or spelling mistakes.
The author tries to find a connection between characters in the novels of lev tolstoy and Cao Yu.
From the content, the author has a further understanding of the original work and collected relevant materials. How to draw your own conclusion through the analysis of the data is the purpose of this paper, and it is at this point that the author has made great efforts.
Comments: The structure of the paper is complete, and all parts basically conform to the English writing standards.
The title of the paper is very good and creative.
In order to write this paper well, the author has done some research, especially Steinbeck's original work.
It is not difficult to see from the author's reference to the original work that the author is quite familiar with the content of the original work.
The language is also very sharp, and the paper is clear-headed, well-founded, with unique views, which has certain reference value and can be regarded as a good article.
Comments: The topic of this article is meaningful. On the basis of absorbing academic research results, it is reasonable to have your own experience and put forward your own views.
The argument is correct, the material is substantial, the narrative is clear and logical.
Clear pronunciation and mellow voice are extremely smooth.
Writing conforms to academic norms.
In the future, we should further sum up experience, compare music education modes and teach music better.
The paper can be submitted on time, and after careful revision, it meets the requirements of undergraduate graduation thesis.
Comments: The topic of this paper has strong application value, and the literature is collected in detail, and the knowledge learned is comprehensively used to solve problems. The data obtained are reasonable, the conclusion is correct and there are innovative opinions.
In addition, the format of the paper is correct, the text is standardized, the organization is clear and the language is fluent.
In the future, we should further sum up experience and compare moral education models, so that moral education can be carried out better.
The paper can be submitted on time, and after careful revision, it meets the requirements of undergraduate graduation thesis.
What is the purpose of the tutor's academic comment on the doctoral thesis?
The viewpoint is correct, the materials are substantial, and all parts basically conform to the English thesis writing norms.
The title of the paper is very good and creative.
In order to write this paper well.
Judging from the content, the author has a deeper understanding of the original work and collected relevant information, which is a good article.
Comments: The topic of the paper is meaningful. On the basis of absorbing academic research results, how to draw your own conclusions by analyzing the data is the purpose of writing this paper, which has reached the requirements of undergraduate thesis. The structure is complete, the language is fluent, and no serious grammar and spelling mistakes are found.
In the future, we should further sum up experience, compare music education modes and teach music better.
The paper can be submitted on time, and after careful revision, it provides a new basis, meets all kinds of requirements of academic proofreading, has full argumentation and unique views, and has certain reference value.
Comment.
The paper is standard in writing, fluent in sentences, clear in narrative hierarchy and strong in logic, which has great practical value in dealing with the distortion of accounting information.
Clear pronunciation and mellow voice are extremely smooth.
Writing conforms to academic norms and meets the requirements of undergraduate graduation thesis. The author is quite familiar with the original content.
The language is also sharp and the paper is clear.
That is to say, in the first draft, except that the paragraphs are too thin, the writing is standardized, the organization is clear, and the language is fluent.
We should further sum up our experience in the future.
Comment.
The author tries to find a connection between lev tolstoy and Cao Yu's novels. The author has done some research, especially Steinbeck's original works.
It is not difficult to see from the author's reference to the original work.
The author's thinking is clear and the discussion process is rigorous: this paper studies the comments on accounting information distortion, and the conclusion is correct and innovative.
In addition, the format of the paper is correct, the documents are collected in detail, and the data obtained are reasonable by comprehensively applying the knowledge learned to solve problems: the topic of the paper has strong application value, and I have personal experience and put forward my own views, which makes sense: the topic of the paper is basically consistent with the content of the paper, and it is at this point that the author has made great efforts.
Comments: The structure of the paper is complete, the analysis is reasonable and the results are practical. Comparing moral education modes can make moral education play a better role.
Papers can be submitted on time and carefully revised. ...
How to write comments and suggestions on papers?
This department is very expressive.
4. Rich materials and reliable data can be processed and sorted by scientific methods.
(2) Good 1. Can correctly reflect the relevant policies of the party and the state and the actual work of the unit.
A correct and comprehensive analysis of the problem has a certain reference function and comprehensiveness, a certain depth or originality, and a certain guiding significance for practical work.
3. The center is prominent.
3. The center is clear, the arguments are sufficient, the levels are clear, the sentences are fluent, the arguments are sufficient, the structure is rigorous, and the levels are clear, good and bad.
The specific standards of graduation thesis of Correspondence College of Central Party School are copied as follows for reference.
(1) Excellent 1. It can correctly reflect the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, and the data are basically reliable and can be well processed and sorted. 1. Criteria for Graduation Thesis Evaluation According to relevant regulations, the evaluation results of graduation thesis can generally be classified as excellent, and the theories learned can be well combined with relevant knowledge of this major.
2. Be able to get close to this system and have good expression skills.
4. Rich in information, you can make good use of the knowledge related to your major.
2. Can better contact with the actual work, and fail in CET-4.
How to write comments and suggestions on papers?
I. Criteria for Graduation Thesis Evaluation According to relevant regulations, graduation thesis evaluation results can generally be divided into four grades: excellent, good, passing and failing.
The specific standards of graduation thesis of Correspondence College of Central Party School are copied as follows for reference.
(1) Excellent 1. Can correctly reflect the relevant principles and policies of the party and the state, and can comprehensively apply the theories learned and the relevant knowledge of this major.
2. Be able to closely contact the actual work of this system, this department and this unit.
The analysis of the problem is correct and comprehensive, with certain depth or originality, which has certain guiding significance for practical work.
3. The center is prominent, the arguments are sufficient, the structure is rigorous, the level is clear, and the expression ability is strong.
4. Rich materials and reliable data can be processed and sorted by scientific methods.
(b) OK 1. Can correctly reflect the relevant policies of the party and the state, and can better use the knowledge related to this theory and specialty.
2. Being able to better connect with the actual work and correctly and comprehensively analyze the problems has certain reference function for guiding the actual work.
3. The center is clear, the arguments are sufficient, the levels are clear, the sentences are fluent, and the expression ability is good.
4. The materials are rich, the data are basically reliable, and it can be well processed and sorted.