Refutation refers to discussing certain events and problems, exposing and refuting wrong and reactionary views or propositions. There are three forms to refute wrong and reactionary arguments: ① directly refute the other party's arguments. First quote the absurd arguments of the other side, then directly refute them with correct truth and conclusive facts, revealing the contradiction between lies and facts, absurdity and truth. Some articles first prove that the argument contrary to the opponent's argument is correct. This proves that the argument against the enemy is wrong. 2 refute each other's arguments by refuting each other's arguments. Argument is the basis of argument and proves it. Wrong reactionary arguments are often based on wrong arguments. If the argument is refuted, it will be untenable. (3) by refuting the fallacy of the other party's argument process (refuting its argument) to refute the other party's argument. Refute the key issues in his argument. This refutes the fallacy. There are three methods of refuting papers: refuting arguments, refuting arguments and refuting arguments. The rebuttal argument is higher than the first two. Although there are two ways of argumentation and refutation, they are not completely separated. Refutation and position are dialectical unity. In argumentative writing, it is sometimes necessary to refute wrong arguments. In argumentative writing, it is generally necessary to refute wrong arguments and clarify correct views at the same time. Therefore, in argumentation, argument and rebuttal are often used together.

Excuse me, is this it