""rockhopper, streaky pork, leopard tail.
First of all, we should be familiar with the general structure and content arrangement characteristics of argumentative papers. Argumentative essays can generally be divided into three parts, which generally involve "what", "why" and "how":
The first part: the beginning or introduction, asking questions and answering "what is it";
The second part: the text or this part, analyze the question and answer "why";
The third part: the ending or conclusion part, solving the problem and answering "how".
Pay attention to two points: "why" and "how" should be emphasized in different articles, and most of them emphasize "why"; Don't write two paragraphs as "the third paragraph" It is generally appropriate for middle school students to write argumentative essays in about five paragraphs.
The ancients said, "Don't look at the face and dance the pen, the text is beside the point."
Zhang Zhigong's On Traditional Writing: the most important "concept" in traditional rhetoric. It not only pays attention to the problem of division and combination, such as Mencius' "the weather is not as good as the place", but also pays attention to the beginning and the end.
There are ups and downs.
Reasoning, avoiding vulgarity and seeking truth (seeing the big from the small and seeing the strange from the ordinary)
Exquisite skills (personification, expression of ambition, emotion in the scene ...)
Unique style (diaries, letters, novels, poems
Interview, fable, short play, split shot
Script ...)
Second, find the layout of the article.
There are a lot of words about five paragraphs.
Positive and negative comparison of famous sentences and parallel analogy in ancient and modern China and foreign countries
Parallel layered attention structure
From small to large, from people to things, from shallow to deep, from reality to emptiness.
From virtual to real, from phenomenon to essence
Pay attention to dialectical thinking
Sincere feelings, bold writing, and discretion.
Speak with a sense of the times and speak fluently.
The content is not enough to play the material.
Argumentative essays generally answer three questions: what, why and how, which are emphasized in different articles.
Most people will focus on "why".
First of all, learn to analyze the intention of excellent compositions: other special cases of "intention": "An imperfect life is equally wonderful"
First, life is really not perfect
The trick of white clouds and free wind
The surprise of the eagle flying crossbow
Resistance of running water to gravel spraying
Xiang Yu brilliant Wujiang commit suicide.
Kong Ming divided the world into three parts: Wissing and Shu.
Sun Wen's Three People's Principles are in trouble.
Second, an imperfect life is equally wonderful.
Xiang Yu's fighting posture has no integrity.
Kong Ming has no mouth or heart.
Sun Wen has no reputation as an empire.
The white clouds cleared away and melted into the world.
Eagles fight in the sky, but hunters are hard to find.
The running water hit the rocks and turned into a rainbow.
People know themselves.
1 is a weapon to overcome conceit and inferiority (psychology)
The opposite of "self-knowledge" is conceit, inferiority (and harm)
B "Self-knowledge" is the basis for correctly evaluating yourself-success.
It is easy to know people, but difficult to understand them.
A famous saying; "Those who know others are wise, and those who know themselves are clear."
"The authorities are confused, but bystanders are very clear."
"People don't know their ugliness, and horses don't know their faces."
Why (preference, tolerance)
C knows both advantages and disadvantages.
3. It is a measure of a person's ideological and moral maturity.
Contact: individual (personality, morality, ability, learning)-country
Tie a similar composition topic: "Evaluate yourself correctly"