1, column phenomenon;
2. Show shortcomings;
3. Explore the root causes;
4. Point out the direction. This paper tries to take the senior high school text and Mr. Lu Xun's masterpiece "Takeism" as an example to analyze this feature of the criticism.
Paper duplicate check should also pay attention to the following points:
(1), aim at the traverse to the child. To write an argumentative essay, we must first set out the fallacies or reactionary views of the other side and set goals. There are usually two methods. The first is an overview. That is, retelling the refuted enemy theory in popular language. When summing up, you can quote some original words appropriately, but it should be focused and the tendency should be clear. The second is the quotation. That is, extract the key parts or related parts of negative materials, and then refute them against the target.
2. Get to the point. Lu Xun said: "It is the key to' discussing the enemy'. It only takes one blow to cause fatal harm to people." We must grasp the reactionary nature of fallacies and heresies and expose and criticize them in depth.
3. Pay attention to discretion. We must distinguish between the enemy's counter-revolutionary fallacies and the wrong ideas among the people. Expose the enemy mercilessly, denounce the enemy and give a fatal blow; We must adhere to the principle of "unity-criticism-unity" for erroneous ideas among the people, and we must never compare them.
Extended data:
Argumentative papers are generally divided into argumentative papers and refuting papers.
1, parameter
Argumentative writing is an argument method to explain the author's views and opinions on certain events or problems from the front. To write an argumentative essay, we must:
(1), the argument should be correct and clear. Correctness means that the argument itself should conform to Marxism-Leninism, Mao Zedong Thought and Deng Xiaoping Theory, conform to objective reality and stand the test of practice. Distinctive means that the author must clearly express what he affirms, denies, agrees with and opposes, and must not be vague or ambiguous.
(2) The arguments should be true and sufficient. In other words, we must cite enough facts or recognized truths to prove the correctness of the argument. Facts as arguments include representative and conclusive examples or historical facts, as well as statistical data. It is very convincing to use facts as arguments.
It is also very convincing to use scientific truth as an argument. If the principles, laws and formulas of natural science are taken as arguments, they can also play a powerful role in proving arguments.
(3), the argument must conform to the correct form of reasoning. Writing argumentative essays should be well-founded and logical. Argument commands argument, and argument proves argument. The argument must be sufficient to prove the argument, and the argument must be an inevitable conclusion inferred from the argument.
Step 2 refute
Refutation means expressing opinions on certain events and problems, exposing and refuting wrong and reactionary views or propositions.
There are three forms to refute wrong and reactionary arguments:
(1), directly refute each other's arguments. First point out the absurd arguments of the other side, then directly refute them with correct truth and conclusive facts, revealing the contradiction between lies and facts, absurdity and truth. In some articles, it is first proved that the argument opposite to the enemy's argument is correct, thus proving that the enemy's argument is wrong.
(2) refute each other's arguments by refuting each other's arguments. Argument is the basis of argument, which proves the argument. Wrong reactionary arguments are often based on wrong arguments. If the argument is refuted, it will be untenable.
(3) refute the other party's argument by refuting the fallacy of the other party's argument process (refuting its argument). Refuting the key issues in his argument also refutes the fallacy.