People's activities of getting familiar with the world and transforming the world are consciously and purposefully carried out, which is the expression of people's conscious initiative. However, the exertion of people's conscious initiative is restricted by objective laws and conditions. Only by respecting objective conditions and following objective laws can we give full play to our conscious initiative correctly and effectively and succeed in practice. On the other hand, ignoring objective conditions and acting against objective laws will be punished and will fail in practice.
In the face of the objective laws of nature and society, whether people can achieve their goal of transforming the world is the so-called freedom problem. The process of human differentiation into nature is closely related to the formation and development of human labor. Therefore, freedom is the product of labor first, and it develops with the development of human material production labor. In order to survive and develop, human beings have to engage in material production and labor, transforming "external necessity" into "my necessity" and thus gaining freedom. Engels said: "Freedom lies not in getting rid of the laws of nature and being independent in fantasy, but in being familiar with these laws, so that the laws of nature can serve a certain purpose in a planned way." Therefore, freedom is not familiar with activities and transformation activities themselves, but people's ability to be familiar with inevitability and use it to serve themselves. It is a state of self-awareness, self-reliance and autonomy that people show in their activities.
The above is the content and wisdom of a political paper I have seen. However, hidden rules are also an objective law, right? Violation of unspoken rules will also be punished by unspoken rules, right? In other words, if you don't follow the hidden rules, it won't work in the end.